[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re: Twardy...Gain Risk Index



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Lionel,


In the October issue of S& C 2004 is a sidebar "Fitting a trendline by least squares" by Arthur Merrill.

And an "Historical Results"overview by John P. Twardy himself.

The overview consists  of : date of buy signal ( purchase at the close of the next trading day)
                                                fund name
                                                Buy price
                                                Sell price
                                                Percent gain or loss
                                                Value of hypothetical portfolio

Funds are eg. fselx, fdcpx,fshcx,fscsx etc.
Twardy stated that an investment of 10.000 $ on 1/3/90 grew to 279,335 $ by 12/26/01

Twardy doesnot give an formula at all. So a formula (Metastock) was my initial question?

In the article is an website which should belong (belonged?) to Twardy: fundsector.com but  I tried it 14 days ago and did not get any connection at all.

When you google Twardy  you'll find something connected with a company making software.
A sideline in S&C says: John P. Twardy is a mechanical engineer who has been trading equities and writing programs for various systems for 20 years. His website is //www.fundsector.com


Regards,

Kees Takkenberg




  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Lionel Issen 
  To: equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 1:03 AM
  Subject: RE: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re: Twardy...Gain Risk Index


  Preston:

  1. Where is the "attached spreadsheet"?

  2. Can you clarify how reward and risk are calculated?

  3. Does John Twardy have a web site?

  Thanks for this posting

  From: equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
  On Behalf Of pumrysh
  Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 4:45 PM
  To: equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Subject: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re: Twardy...Gain Risk Index

  From TASC:

  TRADING SECTOR FUNDS USING STATISTICS 

  Editor, 
  The October 2004 article by John Twardy, "Trading Sector Funds Using 
  Statistics," piqued my interest, and the sidebar on determining a 
  trendline by least squares was very helpful. I do have a request for 
  a couple of clarifications. 

  The gain/risk index is to be computed for each sector fund for the 
  last 30 days. The next step is to "rank the funds according to this 
  index." Please explain how the ranking relates to 30 days of 
  gain/risk index computations. Is a 30-day average to be used? Also, 
  there is reference to the value of the "sum of the gain/risk index 
  values for all funds for any given day makes up the sector trend 
  index. This gives you the overall trend of the market, which is 
  helpful for this short-term analysis." How is this value 
  specifically used when selecting the highest-ranking fund? 

  Pete Bock 
  via email 

  John Twardy replies: 
  Only the last 15 days of data is used. The article should have 
  stated to "do this for each of the past 15 days," not 30 days, 
  although this really doesn't affect the results, as only the most 
  current 15 days of data is used. 

  The sector trend index is not used for selecting the highest-ranked 
  fund -- it just gives you a "feel" for the market trend. 

  MORE ON TRADING SECTOR FUNDS 

  Editor, 
  After struggling for the past few days unsuccessfully to replicate 
  the gain/risk index shown on page 84 of John Twardy's October 2004 
  article, "Trading Sector Funds Using Statistics," for FIDSX (6.2) 
  and FBMPX (18.7), I wondered how would be the best way to ask 
  questions that might help me to successfully replicate Twardy's 
  work. I thought the most direct way would be to send you my 
  spreadsheet [not shown--Editor], which I produced based on my 
  interpretation of the instructions you gave on page 83. 

  The attached spreadsheet has two tabs, one labeled FBMPX and the 
  other labeled FIDSX. I have reduced the dataset to only that data 
  which should be necessary to produce a gain/risk index result for 
  August 26, 2002. 

  Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated. 

  Axel Gumeson 
  via email 

  John Twardy replies: 
  The discrepancy appears to be because you have used adjusted Nav 
  data instead of closing data -- that, and it appears that some of 
  your historical data has been corrected, which resulted in slight 
  differences in our calculations. Taking all this into account, your 
  spreadsheet now duplicates the results I get with the adjusted data. 

  ----------------------------------------------------------
  -----------

  METASTOCK CODE FOR TRADING SECTOR FUNDS 

  Editor, 
  I have been a long-time subscriber to Stocks & Commodities. I 
  especially enjoy the articles that discuss trading methods. 

  In the October 2004 article "Trading Sector Funds Using Statistics," 
  I had a couple of questions for the author, John Twardy. First, I 
  wanted to better understand the logic behind the gain/risk ratio. 

  The way I understand it, the highest-performing 15-day sector with 
  the lowest standard deviation to a 15-day linear regression line is 
  the one to select. A high return with low risk -- that sounds very 
  good. But why 15 days? And could it be done on weekly data? What 
  kind of testing was done to end up with 15 days? 

  Second, I attempted to create a MetaStock formula, but I was not 
  able to fully understand the basis for the formula in the article. 
  Here is what I tried: 

  ROC(c,15.%)/(Sqrt(Var(Linearreg(c,15),15))) 

  Unfortunately, I was not able to get the same results as in the 
  article. I know that you sometimes get the software vendors to 
  submit code. Any help would be appreciated. 

  D.J. Vatalero 
  via email 

  John Twardy replies: 
  I looked at various time periods -- 30 days and 15 days -- to find a 
  system that would trade often enough to keep up with market trends 
  but not so frequently as to create seesaw trading. In my testing, 
  the 15-day average outperformed the 30-day average. Taking the 30-
  day minimum holding period (for the Fidelity fund) and looking at 
  the performance over half the holding period helps to show the trend 
  that is hidden in the longer-term average. 
  Regarding MetaStock code, sorry, that's not something I can help 
  with. 

  --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  <mailto:equismetastock%40yahoogroups.com> , "ktakkenberg" 
  <c.a.takkenberg@xxx> wrote:
  >
  > HI, I am looking for a Metastock formula probably called The 
  Twardy 
  > Indicator?
  > In October 2004 there was an article "Trading Sector Funds Using 
  > Statistics," by John Twardy, in Stocks & Commodities page 82.
  > Normally Equis supplies the formula with the article.But not this 
  time.
  > On the internet I found an email to S&C where some-one wrote to 
  have 
  > tried to make the correct formula but was in doubt if he/she did 
  so?
  > The formula was: 
  > 
  > ROC(c,15,%)/(Sqrt(Var(Linearreg(c,15),15))) 
  > I would like to know if this is the right-one or if anyone knows 
  the 
  > correct "Twardy Indicator"?
  > 
  > Thanks for helping me out!
  > 
  > Kees Takkenberg
  > The Netherlands.
  >

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:equismetastock-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:equismetastock-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/