|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Jeff,
As I have pointed out to jao, the exploration problems usually
relate to calculations of the exponential or Wilders based
indicators and having an adequate amount of time for the
calculations to take place.
I can duplicate jao's problems but only if I use an exploration data
period that is too short.
In your case I don't know what indicators you are using but I would
bet there are some exponential based indicators in there. If you
want us to take a look we would be happy to.
Double checking your exploration against the chart value is
certainly a good idea and should be part of a standard operating
procedure. It just makes good sense.
Preston
--- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "jwlcfp" <jeff@xxx> wrote:
>
>
> I have experienced this problem also. I have been working with
Equis on
> it off and on for the past 6 months and I have not been able to
resolve
> the issue. I have sent them my "holy grail" formulas and they
have not
> been able to solve the issue. They had me try the things that
have been
> suggested here and they had me remove my program and start with a
new
> version of metastock. I had numerous updates. They said they
> periodically change the way formulas are calculated in different
> versions. They could not tell me what formulas were changed with
the
> various versions to see if my "holy grail" formulas were impacted.
> Never the less, this did not fix the problem.
>
> I noticed the problem in a custom formulas- a binary wave that
would
> produce a 1 for buy, 0 for hold and -1 for sell. In addition I
will
> sometimes receive different answers using the same data on
different
> computers. Daily I double check the daily, weekly and monthly
> explorer results with the graph results on my current holdings -
approx
> 20 investments. The errors are not consistent- by investment, time
> period or frequency. Out of approximately 60 data points (20
> investments x 3 time periods per exploration) there will be
between zero
> to 6 errors on a daily basis. The average is 2. I make it a
standard
> procedure to double check my exploration.
>
> I love Metastock, but this problem does concern me. I wish I could
> resolve it!
>
> Jeff
> --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "strade_hn" <strade_hn@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> > I used explored to scan my stock, but value return in explorer is
> > quite different with one in chart. I use RSI(C,14) in explorer
returns
> 50
> > while in chart it's 63.
> > Can anyone help me with this problem?????
> >
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:equismetastock-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:equismetastock-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|