|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
>>BUt in reality, I havent seen any people say I totally went
BAnkrupt.<<
Perhaps you need to broaden the net you cast:
http://www.amazon.com/What-Learned-Losing-Million-
Dollars/dp/0963579495
I hope you can get it from your library.
--- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, thomas ng <thomas12ng@xxx>
wrote:
>
> I does not matter whether it is right or wrong. the main issues are
are you making money from your URSC (Unidentified Relative Strength
Comparison) :)..
>
> If you said it is OK than it will be OK. you can trade this. But I
will personally knock your door and remind you the thing that you
have said. How is that sound? I just keep my self relax on my
statement since one of the result has been revealed and the past was
been prooved by many TA's.
>
>
> Regarding coding, you may visit other forum meta trader for e.g.
there are a lot of experienced coder who keep their profile as low as
possible and I am learnign from one of them. Many people can only say
on how much money they made from market.BUt in reality, I havent seen
any people say I totally went BAnkrupt. Some even dare to stated the
system is current not in the market or the author has move to another
market. Only a rookie or embicille who can believe this statement.
So, Is it sleeping or drunk?????:)
>
> There is no such a thing as a free luch in this world. Regarding
testing this tool on the tradesim, I dont have much time as I am
working on my project (improvement of ATR trigger) and my C++
programming. And also I dont find my self interested on this method
or wish to know other people trading system so you need to test your
own argument LOL. but those who are interested can personally email
Tech Trader a.k.a John. He is an aussie trader who tried to develop a
decent trading system that trade consistently over period regardless
the current market condition ( either is bad or good ) back in 2003.
Again you can find him on Aussie Stock Forum. not in this forum
>
>
> PLease follow the comment from one of the ALPARI owners on the
fallacy of universality concept and the common mistake of traders.
>
>
> Good Luck
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Cameron Reid <cwr_74@xxx>
> To: equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Monday, 10 September, 2007 1:39:45 AM
> Subject: RE: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re: Relative Strength
Comparison Analysis
>
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I would be very interested in any information you might have on
this.
>
> I don't mean to say that I know definitively that you are wrong,
but I do know that many of the member of The Motley Fool's Mechanical
Investing board have found External Relative Strength to be a very
significant and consistent indicator going back to 1969. The members
of the WER mechanical investing board share similar conclusions while
testing a universe of much smaller companies. And I have found ERS
values to be very helpful in improving trading systems that I work
with on TradeSim. If you feel strongly that my use of this indicator
will cause me to lose money and would like to provide evidence that
demonstrates those points that you appear to hold so strongly, it
would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Cameron
>
>
> To: equismetastock@xxx: thomas12ng@xxx: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 02:11:52
+0000Subject: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re: Relative Strength Comparison
Analysis
>
>
>
>
> Oh my goodness!!!!!!!!!!! the discussion is only about this topic
again. On the first place I have emphasised that this methodology
does not tell us anything but some people persist on his opinion on
how gorgeous this concept. I could not argue more. Now the fact has
been reveal one by one. I deliberately let people discuss and figure
out that I am absolutelly correct while others in my opposite is
totally wrong. If it necessary I will reveal one of former commercial
trading system in this forum so that people will start thinking on
developing their own strategy. Cheers Thomas--- In
equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, superfragalist <no_reply@> wrote:>>
First IBD doesn't compare each stock to a base index. IBD uses>
External Relative Strength which compares every stock to every other>
stock in the population someone is using. > > I've tested many
ranking formulas and External Relative Strength works> better as a
filter than any of the other method
> including Relative> Strength Comparatives, which is what you are
talking about. > > If you want an ERSC ranking that is the same as
the IBD ranking, the> old SpyGlass plugin does that. It's called Fire
now.> > SpyGlass puts a ranking value from 1 to 100 on each stock in
the ERSC> comparison population and the numerical value means the
same thing> from week to week and can be used in the tester. > > RSC
values are meaningless in the tester because they are a relative>
number only and do not have the same meaning from week to week. > >
As far as counting goes, Roy uses a dll function in the explorer
that> can count but I don't think it can sort on the highest value. I
don't> use it so Roy will have to explain it. > > You can always
export your list to excel and have excel sort and> number them. > > >
Super > > > > > > --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "cherotree1"
<mass54thcob@>> wrote:> >> > I am using this formula ROC(MOV
((C/P),26,S),1,%), and
> comparing it to > > a base index, to generate a list of securities
which I can then sort > > by either Relative Strength, Symbol or
Security Name. > > > > My question to the group; is it possible to
have the printed output of > > this list numbered i.e. number 1 for
strongest, up to the last number > > in my list. Or, is it even
possible to rank this list similar to the > > RS rankings that are
listed by Investors Business Daily (maybe 100-> > strongest to 0-
weakest). Any and all replys are appreciated. Peace!> > > > Charles>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Gear up for Halo® 3 with free downloads and an exclusive offer.
It's our way of saying thanks for using Windows Live?.
> http://gethalo3gear.com?ocid=SeptemberWLHalo3_WLHMTxt_2
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
______________________________________________________________________
______________
> Sick of deleting your inbox? Yahoo!7 Mail has free unlimited
storage.
> http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/unlimitedstorage.html
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:equismetastock-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:equismetastock-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|