[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[EquisMetaStock Group] Re: Relative Strength Comparison Analysis



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Thomas,

I think this site would disgree with you.

http://www.highgrowthstock.com/

Preston

 

--- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "thomas12ng" <thomas12ng@xxx> 
wrote:
>
> Oh my goodness!!!!!!!!!!! the discussion is only about this topic 
> again. On the first place I have emphasised that this methodology 
> does not tell us anything but some people persist on his opinion on 
> how gorgeous this concept. 
> 
> 
> I could not argue more. Now the fact has been reveal one by one. I 
> deliberately let people discuss and figure out that I am 
absolutelly 
> correct while others in my opposite is totally wrong. 
> 
> 
> If it necessary I will reveal one of former commercial trading 
system 
> in this forum so that people will start thinking on developing 
their 
> own strategy. 
> 
> 
> Cheers 
> 
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 
> 
> --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, superfragalist <no_reply@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > First IBD doesn't compare each stock to a base index. IBD uses
> > External Relative Strength which compares every stock to every 
other
> > stock in the population someone is using. 
> > 
> > I've tested many ranking formulas and External Relative Strength 
> works
> > better as a filter than any of the other method including Relative
> > Strength Comparatives, which is what you are talking about. 
> > 
> > If you want an ERSC ranking that is the same as the IBD ranking, 
the
> > old SpyGlass plugin does that. It's called Fire now.
> > 
> > SpyGlass puts a ranking value from 1 to 100 on each stock in the 
> ERSC
> > comparison population and the numerical value means the same thing
> > from week to week and can be used in the tester. 
> > 
> > RSC values are meaningless in the tester because they are a 
relative
> > number only and do not have the same meaning from week to week. 
> > 
> > As far as counting goes, Roy uses a dll function in the explorer 
> that
> > can count but I don't think it can sort on the highest value. I 
> don't
> > use it so Roy will have to explain it. 
> > 
> > You can always export your list to excel and have excel sort and
> > number them. 
> > 
> > 
> > Super 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "cherotree1" <mass54thcob@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I am using this formula ROC(MOV((C/P),26,S),1,%), and comparing 
> it to 
> > > a base index,  to generate a list of securities which I can 
then 
> sort 
> > > by either Relative Strength, Symbol or Security Name. 
> > > 
> > > My question to the group; is it possible to have the printed 
> output of 
> > > this list numbered i.e. number 1 for strongest, up to the last 
> number 
> > > in my list. Or, is it even possible to rank this list similar 
to 
> the 
> > > RS rankings that are listed by Investors Business Daily (maybe 
> 100-
> > > strongest to 0-weakest). Any and all replys are appreciated. 
> Peace!
> > > 
> > > Charles
> > >
> >
>




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:equismetastock-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:equismetastock-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/