|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
CLARIFICATION:
The "2 daily breadth models that hit their respective downside targets
today (thurs 7/26), and now flashed a Buy for fri for the SP500." are
solid and will NOT be affectd by "further worries about sub prime, real
estate, etc could cause problems with my model forecasts (market
participant perception is key)." They ARE buys for friday, not that I
recommend anyone follow ANY of my models. The models that could be
afected (not issue a signal are the other's i mentioned.... "Hindenburg
Omen", and third model".
do not worry, i do NOT plan on participating in this list on anything
resembling regular basis.... i dunno no why today i even checked it!
take care.....
altroad1212 wrote:
> oh btw, i have 2 daily breadth models that hit their respective
> downside targets today (thurs 7/26), and now flashed a Buy for fri
> for the SP500. One is 63% accurate, the other 84% (not that accuracy
> is everything, for sure). A third model is close to giving a Buy sig,
> possibly as early as Monday, but if sell off continues, that will be
> delayed or possibly voided. Another says sell Short on Friday's close
> (82% accurate).
> The so called "Hindenburg Omen" said Sell Short a week ago or so
> (according to MY charts), but, my own personal studies show that if
> friday's SP500 low is higher than thur's, and the close is equal to or
> higher than thurs (among another thing i look at), the market sell off
> should be pretty much over short term (bounce), and issue a Buy as
> soon as Monday. However........... further worries about sub prime,
> real estate, etc could cause problems with my model forecasts (market
> participant perception is key)..... but nonetheless, i have to be
> consistent in following models. This volatility is is causing a lot
> of my models to fire....... no telling what my intraday models might
> say...
> so... i am playing the long side now but if intraday model(s) give a
> short sell, i take that too).
>
> anyone else have comments/criticisms/forecasts???
>
> altroad1212 wrote:
>> i have to agree, if the 30 day guarantee was voided simply because
>> Eugene offered a discount, the discount should still be honored
>> unless communicated at the time of the discount offer. wtf is a
>> "refund insurance fee" ???? give me a break. that should tell you
>> something..... I have not read this list or others i sub to in over a
>> year (i'm probably 15k emails behind in all lists combined), so i
>> expect to catch some crap from some. Eugene... u trade the product.
>> and make profits from trading it bro? set me straight pls.
>>
>> kaj
>>
>> Code 2 wrote:
>>> Before this turns into a love-in for Eugene and his TrendMedium, and
>>> we all break out into a chorus of Kum Ba Yah, recall the problems
>>> Yogesh Poddar had with getting Eugene to honor his unconditional
>>> money-back guarantee. I have pasted Yogesh's postings below.
>>>
>>> Oh, and let's all recall Yogesh's quote of Eugene's wonderful reason
>>> for not honoring his refund policy:
>>>
>>> "I'm sorry but we provide refunds for only full-price
>>> products. It's so because the refund insurance fee is included
>>> to the full price. We have sold the product with discount so
>>> we can't provide a refund."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:equismetastock-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:equismetastock-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|