|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Paul,
I was beating around the bush. Its really hard to see what you're
seeing. Always helps if you post a pic of the chart.
The formula for a cross is
Cross(Data Array1, Data Array2)
You are heading in the right direction. See if this helps
A1:=AND Fml("Acciona Binary Wave Composite ");
A2:=Mov(Fml("Acciona Binary Wave Composite"),opt1,E);
Fml("Acciona Binary Wave Composite ") < -2
AND
Cross(A1,A2)
Remember that the binary wave just needs to be below a certain
point. If you select > -4 that argument would almost always be true
since its at the bottom of the ladder so to speak. This way you'll
be down at the bottom but will also have some wiggle room and your
real action point is going to be the cross.
Hope this helps,
Preston
--- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Paul Harris"
<paul_vicmar@xxx> wrote:
>
> Preston
>
> I think I should have been more specific with my explanation. I am
> setting up individual binary waves for each individual stock. Not
one
> binary wave fits all stocks. The plan would be to have a specific
> binary wave for 30 to 50 most actively traded stocks. Then write
> explorations for each stock that will highlight when a possible
buy
> signal is triggered from its binary wave.
>
> I individually test different functions - MA, DI, Stoch etc. to
find
> the most profitable and combine them in a binary wave. Choosing
four
> of the best parameters I make a binary wave so that the range
would
> be from -4 to 4. The four parameters must measure different
functions
> i.e trend, momentum, volume and volatility. The periodicity of the
> parameters are not optimised but are typically short term 5-13
days.
>
> So the idea is to have a buy when the binary wave is rising from -4
> (the strongest buy). Hence the original request.
> The sell would be when the binary wave closes below 0.
>
> I hope I have made myself a little clearer.
>
> Yours
>
> PAUL
>
>
>
> --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pumrysh <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > Paul,
> >
> > I think we have all gone through similar learning processes.
> Binaries
> > while fun are not as widely accepted or used as you would think.
> Part
> > of the reason is because most people settle on one or two key
> > indicators and thats it. You don't need a binary for that. We've
> also
> > learned that we can accomplish the same think with normalized
> > indicators. A lot to consider with their use but once the
> normalized
> > indicator is understood I think you'll find them extremely
useful
> and
> > reliable.
> >
> > As far as the different results results that you are getting,
> remember
> > that no two shares are going to act identically. Could be part
of a
> > lrger economic picture that is driving your results. There is
also
> the
> > probability that your mix or basket of shares may be influencing
> the
> > results. Your problem could also be a result of the type of
> indicators
> > that you are using.
> >
> > Whatever the problem is though I don't think that optimization
is
> the
> > way to go just yet. Many people like to throw a pile of numbers
> > together and optimize thinking they will find spectacular
results
> that
> > aren't there in the first place. There's a right way and a wrong
> way
> > to optimize. If it were me and I felt comfortable with a
particular
> > methodology, I might optimize just to tell me if my results will
> > improve by using smaller incremental numbers rather than a
larger
> > ones.
> >
> > In you case try to optimize the -4 level with either a opt value
> from
> > 3 to 4 stepping once. Then optimize the moving average from a 5
to
> 21
> > stepping by 2. Also limit the number of shares that you optimize
on
> by
> > selecting a small group of share that performed as you would
like
> > rather than throwing the system at a large basket. You can do
that
> > after the system is refined.
> >
> > Hope this helps,
> >
> > Preston
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Paul Harris"
<paul_vicmar@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > My enthusiasm for my solution has been shortlived. Whilst the
> below
> > > improves the profitability it doesn´t accomplish exactly the
> rules.
> > >
> > > Fml("Acciona Binary Wave Composite ") > -4 AND Fml("Acciona
Binary
> > > Wave Composite ") > Mov(Fml("Acciona Binary Wave
> Composite"),opt1,E)
> > >
> > > The buy is "only" generated when the binary wave touches -4
and
> then
> > > increases. For some of the the shares I am looking at this
might
> only
> > > happen in a two year period two or three times.
> > > Any suggestions appreciated
> > >
> > > PAUL
> > >
> >
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:equismetastock-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:equismetastock-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|