|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Preston
Many thanks for your help and effort in this problem. However if you
don´t mind I would like to ask about logic behind
(Fml( "Zero Lag MACD" )
> -LLV(Fml( "Zero Lag MACD" ),48))
> /(HHV(Fml( "Zero Lag MACD" ),48)
> -LLV(Fml( "Zero Lag MACD" ),48)
> +.0000001)*100.
Could you in English just explain what it means?
Yours gratefully
PAUL
--- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pumrysh <no_reply@xxx> wrote:
>
> Paul,
>
> That's great!
>
> Okay, I had a chance to look at it with Metastock open and I think
> you will like this one better.
>
> (Fml( "Zero Lag MACD" )
> -LLV(Fml( "Zero Lag MACD" ),48))
> /(HHV(Fml( "Zero Lag MACD" ),48)
> -LLV(Fml( "Zero Lag MACD" ),48)
> +.0000001)*100
>
>
> Basically a normalized Zero Lag MACD. As an indicator you can use
> the following with any indicator, just place your indicator where
> noted and remove the brackets.
>
> {Normalized Indicator}
> Ind:= {your indicator here};
> Npds:=Input("periods to normalize",
> 1,500,48);
> Norm:=(Ind-LLV(Ind,Npds))
> /(HHV(Ind,Npds)-LLV(Ind,Npds)+.0000001)*100;
> Norm
>
> Enjoy,
>
> Preston
>
> --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "paul_vicmar"
> <paul_vicmar@> wrote:
> >
> > Thanxs success.
> >
> > PAUL
> >
> >
> > --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pumrysh <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Try this:
> > >
> > > (Fml( "Zero Lag MACD" ) -
> > > Mov( Fml( "Zero Lag MACD"),9,EXPONENTIAL)/
> > > Fml( "Zero Lag MACD" ) +
> > > Mov( Fml( "Zero Lag MACD"),9,EXPONENTIAL))* 100
> > >
> > > If not I'm check it out later this pm.
> > >
> > > Preston
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "paul_vicmar"
> > > <paul_vicmar@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Preston
> > > >
> > > > Thanxs for the repsonse. Columm E is OK however Column F is
> still
> > > > incorrect.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pumrysh <no_reply@>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Paul,
> > > > >
> > > > > I will be away from my computer until late afternoon so I
> can
> > > only
> > > > > give some glancing views right now. I do see one immediate
> > > problem.
> > > > >
> > > > > Col E Prev MA
> > > > > Ref Mov(Fml( "Zero Lag MACD" ),9,EXPONENTIAL),-1)
> > > > >
> > > > > should be
> > > > >
> > > > > Col E Prev MA
> > > > > Ref(Mov(Fml( "Zero Lag MACD" ),9,EXPONENTIAL),-1)
> > > > >
> > > > > I also think column F should be changed to
> > > > >
> > > > > Col F %
> > > > > ((Fml( "Zero Lag MACD" ) - Mov( Fml( "Zero Lag MACD"
> > > > > ),9,EXPONENTIAL))/ ((Fml( "Zero Lag MACD" ) + Mov( Fml
> ( "Zero Lag
> > > > > MACD"),9,EXPONENTIAL))* 100
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't have Metastock right now so that may not be correct.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure about the code not working. The original
> discussion
> > > was
> > > > > in January of 2007, so you could go back to
> > > > > http://www.purebytes.com/cgi-local/swish/swish-cgi.pl
> > > > > and look at the original discussion about it. Part of the
> code
> > > given
> > > > > is Amibroker and won't work in Metastock.
> > > > >
> > > > > hope this helps,
> > > > >
> > > > > Preston
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "paul_vicmar"
> > > > > <paul_vicmar@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preston
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanxs for the heads up on the discussion of lag in moving
> > > > > averages. I
> > > > > > had a read through.
> > > > > > So I thought I would go ahead and see if I could not use
> the
> > > > > existing
> > > > > > MACD exploration in Metastock and just substitute normal
> MACD
> > > with
> > > > > > Zero lag MACD. And keep the trigger signal as a 9 day EMA,
> as it
> > > > > > produces fewer whipsaws than for example the Zero lag MACD
> > > Trigger
> > > > > > Signal. However there seems to be a problem.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Zero Lag MACD Exploration
> > > > > > Col A Close
> > > > > > CLOSE
> > > > > > Col B Zero Lag MACD
> > > > > > Fml( "Zero Lag MACD" )
> > > > > > Col C Previous MACD
> > > > > > Ref( Fml( "Zero Lag MACD" ),-1)
> > > > > > Col D Mov Ave
> > > > > > Mov( Fml( "Zero Lag MACD" ),9,EXPONENTIAL)
> > > > > > Col E Prev MA
> > > > > > Ref Mov(Fml( "Zero Lag MACD" ),9,EXPONENTIAL),-1)
> > > > > > Col F %
> > > > > > ((Fml( "Zero Lag MACD" ) - Mov( Fml( "Zero Lag MACD"
> > > > > > ),9,EXPONENTIAL))/ Mov( Fml( "Zero Lag
> MACD" ),9,EXPONENTIAL))
> > > *
> > > > > 100
> > > > > > Filter
> > > > > > CROSS (Fml( "Zero Lag MACD" ),Mov( Fml( "Zero Lag
> > > > > MACD" ),9,EXPONENTIAL)
> > > > > > Any advice to solve the problem would be helpful.
> > > > > > I also had a look at the JMA equivalent PMA, but I was
> unable
> > > to
> > > > > copy
> > > > > > and paste the PMA into Metastock.
> > > > > > http://trader.online.pl/MSZ/e-w-Moving_Average_Phased.html
> > > > > > I am using Metastock 6.52.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yours
> > > > > > PAUL
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pumrysh <no_reply@>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Paul,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The original discussion was about lag in moving averages
> and
> > > > > occurred
> > > > > > > in 2001.
> > > > > > > Go here
> > > > > > > http://www.purebytes.com/cgi-local/swish/swish-cgi.pl
> > > > > > > and look under metastock and 2001 for all the
> discussions.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm not aware of the zerolag being part of the canned
> > > metastock
> > > > > > > package.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It's easy enough though to write it but you might want
> to
> > > > > consider
> > > > > > > using the smoothed version of a Jurik type MA that we
> came up
> > > > > with
> > > > > > > earlier this year.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The mechanics of the exploration will be the same no
> matter
> > > > > whether
> > > > > > > you use an EMA, a Zerolag EMA, or a Jurik type EMA. Its
> just
> > > a
> > > > > matter
> > > > > > > of deciding which you want to use.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If you want to do a zerolag let me know and we'll
> proceed.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Preston
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "paul_vicmar"
> > > > > > > <paul_vicmar@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > OK, so I have a page that provides a Zero Lag MACD
> > > exploration
> > > > > > > > http://trader.online.pl/MSZ/e-ex-
> > > Zero_Lag_EMA_Exploration.html
> > > > > > > > but the code for the indicator given is incorrect and
> comes
> > > up
> > > > > with
> > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > error message.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Indicator : DS_EMA_X_MP()
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Formula : if ( Cross(mov(mov(mp(),4,e))4,e),mov(mov(mp
> > > (),8,e))
> > > > > > > 8,e)),1,
> > > > > > > > if (Cross(mov(mov(mp(),8,e))8,e),mov(mov(mp
> > > (),4,e))
> > > > > 4,e)),-
> > > > > > > 1,
> > > > > > > > 0))
> > > > > > > > And whilst I understand your logic of using a MACD
> > > exploration
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > substituting normal MACD for Zero Lag MACD I don´t
> know if
> > > my
> > > > > > > > understanding of Metastock formula is enough to
> achieve
> > > this.
> > > > > > > > I read somewhere on recent versions of Metastock(9.1)
> that
> > > a
> > > > > zero
> > > > > > > lag
> > > > > > > > MACD exploration comes as a standard exploration.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yours
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > PAUL
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pumrysh
> <no_reply@>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Paul,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Do you have a normal EMA crossover and MACD
> exploration
> > > that
> > > > > you
> > > > > > > like?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Preston
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "paul_vicmar"
> > > > > > > > > <paul_vicmar@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I have been looking at Zero Lag EMA and MACD and
> have
> > > > > noticed
> > > > > > > how
> > > > > > > > > > timely the signals are in respect to other MA
> systems.
> > > > > > > > > > I have been trawling the net in all the usual
> sites to
> > > see
> > > > > if I
> > > > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > > > find a suitable Zero Lag MACD exploration or Zero
> Lag
> > > EMA
> > > > > > > Crossover
> > > > > > > > > > Exploration. But without any success.
> > > > > > > > > > This is the formula I am using for Zero lag EMA
> > > > > > > > > > Period:= Input("What Period",1,250,10);
> > > > > > > > > > EMA1:= Mov(CLOSE,Period,E);
> > > > > > > > > > EMA2:= Mov(EMA1,Period,E);
> > > > > > > > > > Difference:= EMA1 - EMA2;
> > > > > > > > > > ZeroLagEMA:= EMA1 + Difference;
> > > > > > > > > > ZeroLagEMA
> > > > > > > > > > And this is the formula for Zero Lag MACD
> > > > > > > > > > EMA1:= Mov(CLOSE,13,E);
> > > > > > > > > > EMA2:= Mov(EMA1,13,E);
> > > > > > > > > > Difference:= EMA1 - EMA2;
> > > > > > > > > > ZeroLagEMA13:= EMA1 + Difference;
> > > > > > > > > > EMA1:= Mov(CLOSE,21,E);
> > > > > > > > > > EMA2:= Mov(EMA1,21,E);
> > > > > > > > > > Difference:= EMA1 - EMA2;
> > > > > > > > > > ZeroLagEMA21:= EMA1 + Difference;
> > > > > > > > > > ZeroLagMACD:=ZeroLagEMA13 -
> ZeroLagEMA21;ZeroLagMACD
> > > > > > > > > > Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> > > > > > > > > > Thanxs
> > > > > > > > > > PAUL
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:equismetastock-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:equismetastock-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|