|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Jose, I won t I m pleased it works both ways
Bill
Jose Silva <josesilva22@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bill, don't forget to share anything useful re divergence techniques with
the DivergenceKit private usergroup.
jose '-)
http://www.metastocktools.com
--- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bill rook <zipple_acre_udder@xxx>
wrote:
>
> Jose, I ve got the kit and I need to get my mind around as to how best I
can adapt it, and what exactly I m looking to try to achieve with it.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> Jose Silva <josesilva22@xxx> wrote:
> Bill, you can also use and adapt the same risk-normalized/
> annualized profit indicators found in the MACDH/All-In-One Divergence
> kit. http://www.metastocktools.com/MACDH/MACDHdiverg.htm
>
>
> jose '-)
> http://www.metastocktools.com
>
>
>
> --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bill rook <zipple_acre_udder@>
> wrote:
>
> Jose
>
> I agree entirely with your assessment of risk and would buy your URSC
> program, but I fear the work for conversion to UK stocks would prove too
> much for a humble part timer like myself.
>
> Regards
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> Jose Silva <josesilva22@> wrote:
>
> Bill, profits are only one half of the equation - risk is the other.
>
> It's quite possible to increase profits three-fold, and at the same time
> increase drawdowns (risk) four times or more. Increase the risk factor
> far enough, and profit results become meaningless, so just posting
> results based on profit alone is not that useful.
>
> More on taming risk here:
> Trading System Evaluation/Development Tools
> http://www.metastocktools.com/URSC/sysdev.htm
>
>
> jose '-)
> http://www.metastocktools.com
>
>
>
> --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bill rook <zipple_acre_udder@>
> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Without ersa my backtest results on my breakouts scans is only 5% p a.,
> with ersa am getting nearer 14% p.a. (depending on type of stop loss
> used)
>
> Regards
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> a a <swptec@> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are you happy with the results?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> bill rook <zipple_acre_udder@> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I Use 30% 25% 25% 20%
> and 180 days
>
> Might try 40, 20, 20, 20
>
> Regards
>
> Bill
>
>
> lopez abduch <lopezabduch@> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm trying to use the SpyGlass, in the external relative strength,
> under the section "Weights" I'm using 40, 20, 20, and 20% is it ok?.
> Can someone help me?
> Thanks,
---------------------------------
All New Yahoo! Mail – Tired of unwanted email come-ons? Let our SpamGuard protect you.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:equismetastock-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:equismetastock-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|