|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I played around quite a bit with zero-lag moving averages and still
use them. They are OK, but I prefer the ones with lag. The reason is
that they are too responsive, too quick to react and thus they react
to noise rather than to trend. Just my experience....
Regards
MG Ferreira
TsaTsa EOD Programmer and trading model builder
http://www.ferra4models.com
http://fun.ferra4models.com
--- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "formulaprimer"
<formulaprimer@xxxx> wrote:
> Jose's works are very interesting and his formula for his moving
> averages are very useful and also is assistance with the cycle
> projection moving average. The thing I most interested in is the Tri-
> moving average that is in the MS indicator list. It is basically a
> centered moving average but lagged. Will displacd moving averages
> allow for better support/resistance or cross over techniques or
> etc.,,,. Moving averages are the building blocks of technicals, but
> the discussion in this forum and archives are not that up to date with
> techniques of displaced MA, centered (Hurst did something with
> centering), or zero-lag or differencing, or etc. If anybody could add
> there knowledge to this discussion it would be appreciated.
> KS.
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Put more honey in your pocket. (money matters made easy).
http://us.click.yahoo.com/r7D80C/dlQLAA/cosFAA/BefplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|