It’s déjà
vu all over again!...There was another long and rambling discussion about this
on the equismetastock site quite recently.
Seems like we
agree with eachother on that one too.
From:
Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of bradulrich33
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 6:37
AM
To: Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Metastockusers] Coaches
and Athletes
I always liked this analogy, I actually heard it first in relation to
basketball...I think it applies to alot of
things...
Ehlers is essentially a great coach.
He might not be a great player.
You can't learn what great players do from listing
or watching them.
Not because they won't tell you, because they
can't explain it.
So how do you learn to be better than Michael
Jordan? You don't watch
his videos; you go out and practice
fundamentals. Fundamentals are
characteristics that ALL great players have, not
just one. At the
point you have got down the fundamentals, you
still don't copy
Jordan's style, cause each great has their own style, you develop
your
own style.
Great coaches aren't always great players, and
vice versa. Coaches
teach fundamentals, and often focus on one
specific fundamental. Mel
Stoddamire is a pitching coach. Ehlers is an
indicator coach.
---- LSpots keywords ?>---- HM ADS ?>
---- LSpots keywords ?>
---- HM ADS ?>
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS