|
This must have slipped my
attention. I have created several security() function based indicators. But
I always have assigned variables to the security() functions.
At the most, if I switch from daily
to weekly and then back, I get an error, which goes away if I restart
MS.
That would avoid creating several
indicators.
My very humble 2
cents.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 10:13
PM
Subject: Re: [EquisMetaStock Group]
Security Data Function Problem (2nd)
MetaStock's Security() function works reliably better
if you reference
it from separate indicators.
Try
this:
1st
indicator
-------------
===========
500340-open
===========
---8<--------------
Security("500340",O)
---8<--------------
2nd
indicator
-------------
============
500340-close
============
---8<--------------
Security("500340",C)
---8<--------------
Final
indicator
---------------
============
Torquaine
01
============
---8<--------------
{ User input
}
pds:=Input("TOS periods",1,200,100);
{ Reference security
indicators }
Op:=Fml("500340-open");
Cl:=Fml("500340-close");
{
Processing
}
W1:=If(Cl>Op,(Cl-Op)*100/Op,0);
BOSW1:=Sum(W1,pds);
{ Plot
in own window }
BOSW1
---8<--------------
jose
'-)
http://www.metastocktools.com
---
In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Torquaine <torquaine@xxxx>
wrote:
> Dear all
>
> now i am totally confused. I did
apply the following
> code to ADDIDAS Salomon.
>
>
A:=Input("TOS periods",1,200,100);
>
>
W1:=If((Security("500340",C) > Security("500340",O)),
>
(((Security("500340",C)-Security("500340",O))*100)/
Security("500340",O)),
>
0);
> BOSW1 := Sum(W1, A);
> BOSW1;
>
> As stated
earlier, the codes works, but does give
> different returns on DAX -
instead of the value of
> ADDIDAS. Okay - I don't know why. The returned
value
> of the indicator when applied to ADDIDAS is
:
> 43,3493. Applying the following indicator to ADDIDAS :
>
> A:=Input("TOS periods",1,200,100);
>
> W1:=If(C >
O,(C-O)*100/O, 0);
> BOSW1 := Sum(W1, A);
> BOSW1;
>
> The returned value is : 43,3493.
>
> Well, that's what
i expected.
>
> Lets try the same thing on the DAX :
>
> first formula result : 51,8667
>
> second formula result
: 25,4152
>
> ??? What ?!!!!
>
> I have had it for
today - seriously, i know about my
> limited abilities to program -
probably I have made a
> very small - but yet undiscoverable mistake - i
am
> sorry for bothering you like a spammer - but i don't
> get
it?
>
> Thank you very much in advance,
>
>
Torquaine
Yahoo! Groups Links
Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your life partner
online. |