Re: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re: Reuters Datalink Volume

[Tom Loyd <lifferds@xxxxxxxxx>]

Will this work with historic data that is reported properly?  i.e. 1254300  vs. 12543

 

The historic data has the hundreds in the data, Datalink data does not.

joetrade69 <joetrade69@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The following formula will show the true volume that is stored, not 
> necessarily what is displayed:
>
> Prec(V*100,0)
>
>
> Trader Joe...
>
>
> --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Tom Loyd <lifferds@xxxx> wrote:
> > How does one get correct volume from Datalink?  All the volume 
> numbers are /100 and they totally screw up volume sensitive 
> indicators when new data is attached to an old file with historic 
> data from another source.
> >  
> > If that is not possible, is there a fix?
> > 
> >             
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> >  Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

---

Yahoo! Groups Links

• To visit your group on the web, go to:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/
   
• To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   
• Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.