Super,
Hey, no problem...you don't sound like a broken
record...you sound like a shill (a huckster, a non-stop marketing, full-court
press). For a forum that doesn't allow advertising and marketing, I'm
still trying to figure out why pumrysh allows this day-to-day bombardment.
So, Preston, does this mean that all posters that actually "help" people trade
are allowed to pummel the list with unsolicited advertising? Or, is this
forum just for "certain" people to advertise what they sell, everyday??
Inquiring minds want to know.
Take care,
Steve
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 4:05
PM
Subject: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re:
Metastock Add-Ons and Plug-Ins
I don't mean to sound like a broken record, but I've
used and/or tested almost all of the plug-ins and none of them are very
good in my opinion, especially for a longer term investor. I've benched
marked the plug-ins against all of the systems I use daily, so I know
how they perform against my standards.
The only one that's worth
much is Bressert's, but it's really designed for day trading. It can be
used EOD also.
Trade Oracle is almost the same as Performance systems
but it has more gloss on it. It's a lot of small formulas that catch an
entry here or there. Even though the formulas are simple, some of them work
okay. As far as exits go, there's nothing in there I would bother with.
Trade Oracle has the best front end of any MS product. Some of it is
better desgined and programmed than MS itself. It also costs nearly twice
as much.
AlphOmega is Elliot wave wanta be stuff, but I think it
uses peak and through functions, which create their own problems.
Chart patterns is so, so. Most patterns aren't reliable for a
long term trader. Some chart patterns in general seem to work okay,
but I've found higher probability ways to trade so I don't bother with
too much searching for patterns.
Bollinger Bands was the least
effective of the ones I looked at, at least in my opinion. Candlesticks is
okay, if you like candle sticks. But there is no magic in there. Power
Pivots is more peak and trough functions.
ICE is good for
developing symbol specific systems. Most people who buy it don't know how
to use it properly. If they did they'd get much better results. It's best
for a trader who doesn't know anything about systems development but wants
to only trade a small group of stocks. I like ICE because it will force you
to struggle through systems development exercises until you learn about
systems development--well, some people will learn!
Trend Medium is
curve fitting but on a daily basis. ETS is one I haven't used--and I don't
think many other people have either. MetaMarket is so low on the
fundamental analysis scale it doesn't register as far as I'm concerned.
SpyGlass is a mish-mash of old tools.
Now for the broken record part.
The absolute best add-on you can get for MS is Roy's newsletter, even if
you don't want to learn to program your own functions.
www.metastocktips.co.nz
Roy realized from the beginning there was a
limited market for programming education so he added a lot of information
on the systems tester, explorations and now a trading series.
I've
tested and traded everything that's going into the first trading series
from Roy. In my opinion, all of the techniques in MSTT produce better
results than the other MS plug-ins and add-ons. The April and May issues
have some of the best information on trading using TA that you're going to
run across--well, again I should say, it's the clearest, most logical
trading information I've run across. Someone else may have better stuff so
if they do, I wish they would share it with Roy's subscribers so I can get
a chance to test it.
Most people who try to use TA go off on an
indicator fascination trip trying to find the one or two indicators that
work in every market and find the best entries. That's a wild goose chase.
(grail chase)
Using TA to trade stocks is not that difficult, if you
understand a few fundemental things and you use the right strategy and
approach to markets. Most people don't. They start out thinking that TA is
some magic bullet that's going to make them rich. Or that a
specific indicator is going to tell then when to buy and sell a
stock.
After a couple of years chasing their butts, they figure out
that they've missed the boat. Some get lucky and stumble on something
that works okay for them, but most spend thousands of dollars listening
to guru's fill their heads full of crap, and then they still don't
make any money. The statistics that say that 95% of TA users and
want-ta-be traders fail is true. How can so many people be chasing the
wrong stuff.
Based on my experience, what's wrong is not TA itself,
but the strategy and approach newbie's take trying to figure out what to
do with it. Why do you think that MS DOES NOT come with a template
that allows everyone to make money as soon as they install MS on
their computers? Because there is no such thing, so Equis can't sell it to
you.
Making money using TA is not about having the right indicators,
the right plug-ins, the right guru chart setups--it's about how you
see the markets and understand what works and why it works and when it
works.
The reason I keep recommending Roy's newsletter is because it's
has information in it that will change the way people see trading. It
will open their eyes to how money can be made on a consistent basis.
At this point, the skeptics are going to say, well if the stuff in
it works so well, why doesn't everyone use it. The techniques in
Roy's newsletter are simple. Some people like simple, some people
don't. Some are happy making 80% of the maximum amount they could
make without having to become a full time student of TA and get a Ph.D
in trading. Others want to move beyond the 80%, and they feel
they're willing to pay the price to get there, or at least lose
everything trying.
That's fine. You only have to ask yourself a
simple question--is what I'm doing working or not!
If it is: keep
doing it. If it isn't, the cost of Roy's newsletter is an inexpensive way
to learn a lot of new stuff you didn't know and get a chance to experiment
with simple instead of complex. If it works for you then it was worth many,
many times it's price, and if it doesn't, it was cheaper than a bunch of
plug-ins that you have to sell on ebay.
Yes, it has coding
instruction, indicators, system tester information and explorer information
in it, so everyone can get something useful out of it to apply to their
trading. However, what I think is the most useful part of the newsletter is
the way it will change people's view of trading and could help them find a
strategy that's comfortable, consistent and easy to execute.
The
April and May issues are going to consolidate many of the things that have
been said in back issues to this point. Then from June through the next few
months Roy is going to have articles telling you how other traders do
things so readers can contrast other's trading methods and find what works
best for them.
Rather than give Equis $250 or more for plug-ins you're
not going to get anything out of, you be far better off giving Roy $180 for
18 months worth of learning about how use MS to make money.
For
those of you who are tired of hearing me say Roy's newsletter is an
important tool for learning to trade, sorry I bore you. I guess you should
stop reading my posts.
If you're a subsriber, you know why I keep
posting these messages, and after May you'll feel even better about where
you are and what you've gotten.
Maybe someone else will give you
some feedback that one of the plug-ins is the cat's meow when it comes to
trading. I don't know.
Have fun!
--- In
equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "calc103" <calc103@xxxx> wrote: >
> > I have Metastock 8.0. I have been learning the system
through > Metastock Programming Study Guide. I am a buy-and-hold
trader. > > I am prepared to purchase three Metastock Add-On or
Plug-Ins. > > Which three would best suit my purpose? >
> Thanks for any advice. > > calc103
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Checked by AVG
Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 265.8.6 - Release Date:
2/7/2005
Yahoo! Groups Links
|