[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Metastockusers] Time to ditch MetaStock?



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


There seems to be a lot of recent discontent building up with regards 
to the lack of MetaStock development from Equis/Reuters. It is indeed 
true that other charting programs have overtaken MS in a major way.

For example, AmiBroker (AB) can plot a composite system equity curve 
based on hundreds of securities, and allows the changing of parameters 
with the aid of real-time variable sliders.  Watching the AB composite 
equity plot change in real-time is a marvel.
Just getting MetaStock to plot the same single composite equity 
(forget real-time manipulation), involves so much processing overheads 
that it is not practical.

So, AmiBroker is indeed superior to MetaStock in many ways.
However... I still find myself using MetaStock for 95% of my tasks.  
Why?

1) Familiarity & ease of use = time-saving - it generally takes me 
five times longer to code in AB;

2) MetaStock's Graphic User Interface is still superior to AB;

3) More than 95% of programming tasks are basic building blocks which 
don't require complex programming;

4) Successful mechanical trading strategies are composed of 60~80% 
logical thought, and 20~40% actual programming skills.


It is the last point that needs to be generally acknowledged & 
understood.

It is not the actual charting package that decides how successful the 
development of one's mechanical or subjective trading system may be, 
but rather, it's the trader's own ideas and ability to put them into a 
logical & codeable form that makes a good system worth considering.
More programming complexity is not always better.

If I were to be just interested in the intellectual challenge of 
coding difficult or abstract ideas, I would have probably left this 
group to join the AmiBroker camp a long time ago, just as others have 
already done.

However, being much more interested in the bigger picture, means that 
the charting tool is not so important to me.  MetaStock is fine for 
just about all system development purposes.

If productivity is also important to you, and you already use 
MetaStock, you may find that there is little or no need for better/
faster tools, or for re-learning a new process.
If you are not using a charting package yet, consider MetaStock's easy 
learning curve before choosing a career in rocket science.

Take care not to lose sight of the forest for the trees. :)


jose '-)
http://www.metastocktools.com








------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
What would our lives be like without music, dance, and theater?
Donate or volunteer in the arts today at Network for Good!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Tcy2bD/SOnJAA/cosFAA/zMEolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Metastockusers/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/