|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Title: Message
Andrew,
Have you looked at
implementing the GlobalVar.dll (used by Roy extensively in his TE systems and
available from his web site).
I ran into a similar
problem some time ago with multiple use of Fml and FmlVar calls in a
fairly complicated system I was working on; reworking my code to utilise the
features of GV gave me a speed increase measured in multiples, not percentages;
IMHO much more I would have achieved by spending more $$ on additional computing
power; my challenge may have been totally different to your current one, however
it may be worth checking out as a first step to see if you can streamline some
your code using the GV.dll.
Regards,
Mike
Sloane
Having
decided that I'm not going to be able to get away from PREV code, I'm
now
trying to work out how to speed up my MS operation. Have some of you
power
users out there found that using faster processors and more RAM makes
a
noticeable speed improvement with MS?
I am using a Dell Dimension
Pentium 4 1.8GHz machine with 768MB of RAM right
now. In my frustration I'm
even wondering if I should go to a dual processor
workstation - but there
would need to be a meaningful pickup in speed. And
is the bottleneck
processing speed, or memory, or bus size, or what?
Are there any
settings (e.g. virtual memory) that can be changed to make
a
difference?
Any and all comments welcome (apart from "code more
efficiently" - as I
think Roy is about to tell us, when you are using
latches with independent
variables and trailing stop code, getting away
from PREV is real hard).
Best
Andrew
El presente correo ha sido analizado por la plataforma Soluciones ADSL
y se encuentra libre de virus.
| Yahoo! Groups Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
![click here]() | |
![]() |
Yahoo! Groups Links
|