[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[EquisMetaStock Group] For Jose Re: Please help me, Thank you very much



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


Lynn,

Let me interject something that you may want to check.
The variables that Jose' used were:

{ Variables }
pdsK:=3;
pdsSlow:=14;
pdsD:=3;
threshold:=50;

With these settings I got a STCH of 51.29 and a SIG of 52.32 on WMT 
for the 23rd. Changing the variables to the following:

{ Variables }
pdsK:=14;
pdsSlow:=3;
pdsD:=3;
threshold:=50;

With these settings I got a STCH of 60.86 and a SIG of 53.25 on WMT 
for the 23rd.

This is nothing more than a matter of taste as to how many stochastic 
periods you use and how much smoothing you do. Some traders like the 
former over the latter. 

The Signal condition should have kicked out WMT so I'm going to guess 
that your data may be a little closer. Unless the precision is 
defined, metastock will round off the data which may have happened in 
your case. Check the precision function to see how this works.

{ Signal condition }
 Stch>signal AND Stch>threshold-10 AND Stch<threshold+10

By all means plot the indicator as Jose' suggest in another window in 
order to see the indicator at work.


Preston








--- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "lynn14344" <darisr@xxxx> 
wrote:
> 
> Hi Jose
> 
> I'm sorry to say I dont understand what your trying to explain. I 
> really am sorry. But if you look at the attached results you will 
> find that the results does not meet the required criteria. Any 
> further simplier layman explaination please.
> 
> Thank you
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Jose" <josesilva22@xxxx> 
> wrote:
> > 
> > Lynn, plot these two *indicators* in their own window below your 
> > charts:
> > 
> > ---8<------------------
> > { Variables }
> > pdsK:=3;
> > pdsSlow:=14;
> > pdsD:=3;
> > threshold:=50;
> > 
> > { Stochastic }
> > Stch:=Stoch(pdsK,pdsSlow);
> > signal:=Mov(Stch,pdsD,S);
> > 
> > { Signal, Stochastic plot }
> > threshold-10;threshold+10;signal;Stch
> > ---8<------------------
> > 
> > The first indicator plots a 3/14 Stochastic, 3EMA signal line, as 
> well 
> > as the 60 and 40 threshold lines as per your suggestion.
> > 
> > It's absolutely essential to keep a visual tab on our system 
logic 
> > with the aid of indicators, rather than take stabs in the dark 
> with 
> > explorations alone.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ---8<------------------
> > { Variables }
> > pdsK:=3;
> > pdsSlow:=14;
> > pdsD:=3;
> > threshold:=50;
> > 
> > { Stochastic }
> > Stch:=Stoch(pdsK,pdsSlow);
> > signal:=Mov(Stch,pdsD,S);
> > 
> > { Signal condition }
> > Stch>signal
> > AND Stch>threshold-10
> > AND Stch<threshold+10
> > ---8<------------------
> > 
> > The second indicator is identical to the exploration filter code.
> > 
> > It says:
> >  Stochastic must be above its 3EMA signal line,
> >  AND Stochastic must be greater than 40
> >  AND Stochastic must be less than 60
> > 
> > And that, is precisely what it does.
> > 
> > 
> > It's in the nature of computing that there is no room for 
> ambiguity.
> > At the same time, computers are unable to second-guess us or make 
> > decisions for us.  It cannot give us "good results" without our 
> full 
> > input.
> > 
> > The only possible efficiency improvement I can see here, has to 
> > originate somewhere else outside the Metastock code.  ;)
> > 
> > 
> > jose '-)
> > 
> > 
> > --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "lynn14344" <darisr@xxxx> 
> > wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi Jose
> > > This a list of stocks under the NYSE and if I do an exploration 
> on 
> > > the weekly chart based on the mentod you mentioned that is 
> > > 
> > > pdsK:=3;
> > > pdsSlow:=14;
> > > pdsD:=3;
> > > threshold:=50;
> > > 
> > > { Stochastic }
> > > Stch:=Stoch(pdsK,pdsSlow);
> > > signal:=Mov(Stch,pdsD,S);
> > > 
> > > { Signal condition }
> > > Stch>signal AND Stch>threshold-10 AND Stch<threshold+10
> > > 
> > > 
> > > After I did an exploartion based on the last thurs trading on 
> NYSE 
> > > 23/12/04, Only two out of all the stocks mentioned below meets 
> the 
> > > criteria and the last one WMT doesnt meet it infact its in 
> opposite 
> > > direction.
> > > 
> > > So this is what I meant by it does not give a good results. Any 
> way 
> > > of improving it for better efficiency.
> > > 
> > > Security Name	
> > > AIG	AIG	
> > > AOT	AOT		
> > > BMY	BMY		
> > > C	C		
> > > CPN	CPN		
> > > HPQ	HPQ		
> > > JPM	JPM		
> > > KO	KO		
> > > MWD	MWD		
> > > OHP	OHP		
> > > ONE	ONE		
> > > RAD	RAD		
> > > SGP	SGP	
> > > WMT	WMT		
> > > 
> > > Thank you very much for taking your valuable time in looking at 
> my 
> > > issue.
> > > 






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/BefplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/