The Quotes Plus Relative Strength indicator is calculated for each issue each 
day, and becomes part of the data you download to your PC. The indicator ranks 
each issue in the database against every other issue in the database, based on 
its performance for the last 12 months.
Every issue is ranked from 0 to 99 so that its rank is equal to the 
percentage of issues that it has outperformed over the previous 12 month period. 
A rating of 92, for example, means that the issue has outperformed 92% of all of 
the issues in the database.
 
The formula is :
( Current Close / Close from 62 trading days ago ) * .4
+ ( Close from 63 trading days ago / Close from 125 trading days ago ) * 
.2
+ ( Close from 126 trading days ago / Close from 188 trading days ago ) * 
.2
+ ( Close from 189 trading days ago / Close from 251 trading days ago ) * 
.2
This value is sorted for all of the issues, and the top 1% of issues get a 
value of 99. The other issues are ranked similarly, down to the bottom 1%, which 
get a value of 0. 
 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  
  
  Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 3:18 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [Metastockusers] Re: 
  Relative Strength (like Investor's Business Daily)
  
  Jose
  Thanks for your advice. William O'neill 
  talks very passionately about the RSC in his book How to make money in 
  stocks.  I respect his writings. He makes good sense. Its 
  about finding whether the stoick is a leader or laggard.Hise definition 
  is:
  "A proprietary rating that meassures the price 
  performance of a given stock against the rest of the market foir the past 52 
  weeks. Each stock is assigned a performance rating 1 to 99 with 99 being the 
  best.  An RS rating of 99 means the stock has ouitperformed 99%of 
  all  other companies in terms of price performance".  
  
  Peter
  
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    
    
    Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 6:57 
    PM
    Subject: [Metastockusers] Re: Relative 
    Strength (like Investor's Business Daily)
    
Peter, I'd love to put something together to show off 
    this excellent 
tool (URSC), but I'm currently so short of available time 
    that sleep 
seems like a luxury for me now.
There is an excellent 
    set of articles about incorporating the URSC kit 
into a winning trading 
    strategy, being written for Roy's MSTT 
newsletter by a professional 
    trader.  They will be published in the 
January and February issues 
    of MSTT.
http://www.metastocktips.co.nz/
jose 
    '-)
--- In Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "metastkuser" 
    <andysmith_999@xx
..> wrote:
> 
> Peter,
> 
    
> Jose has a Universal Relative Strength Comparative (URSC) plugin 
    for 
> MS. I looked at his website and downloaded the URSC user guide 
    -- it 
> looks like an excellent product. 
> 
> Before I 
    purchase it though, I'd like to get a better understanding 
> on how 
    RSC is best used -- above and beyond just sorting/ranking a 
> list of 
    stocks. 
> 
> Jose, can we convince you to write an 
    "Applications Note"?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
    
>  
> 
> --- In Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 
    "Peter Fox" <pgfox@xxxx> 
wrote:
> > I am sorry but I 
    can't help you with Metastock. I bought and add-
on 
> from Jon 
    Debry a few years ago but haven't always been happy with it 
> seems 
    to miss some stocks in its calculations. If you find out a way 
> in 
    Metastock then let me know. Stan Weinstein also wrote a book 
> 
    mentioning the RS line also.
> > regards
> >   
    ----- Original Message ----- 
> >   From: metastkuser 
    
> >   To: Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> 
    >   Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 7:13 AM
> 
    >   Subject: [Metastockusers] Relative Strength (like 
    Investor's 
> Business Daily)
> > 
> > 
> > 
    
> >   Is there a way in MS9 to plot the equivalent of 
    Investor's 
> Business
> >   Daily's Relative Price 
    Strength (RS) line? Metastocks's RS 
> function 
> 
    >   only compares the stock with an index -- it does not rank 
    
against 
> >   other stocks.
> > 
> 
    >   (NOTE: I'm after the RS line, not just the instantaneous 
    RS).
> > 
> >   
    Thanks!