|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
So you want the market makers to stand in the way of the onslaught so
you can dump your 10 shares and walk away intact? Well, then why
shouldn't the company backstop your investment? Or better yet, maybe
the government should provide insurance against your losses?
If the post-closing news was that the company had developed a cure for
cancer and the stock price opened through the roof, you'd be patting
yourself on the back over what an astute investor you are. Instead,
the news is bad, so you want to blame someone else.
Wake up, buddy. In this business, you're responsible for your own
losses.
Oh, and I've seen you shilling stocks all over the Internet. Take your
stock-promoting spam back to WallStreetTape.com and
EarningsWhispers.com and whatever other rocks you crawled out from.
Trolling for suckers on this list isn't tolerated.
--- In Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "kimlarinc" <wallmann33@xxxx>
wrote:
>
> It's criminal is what it is and it will never change. What am I
> talking about? I find it almost ironically funny that Spitszer and
> the boys are rooting through all the brokerages, looking at fraud
> and trying to protect the little guy, when the biggest nightmare
> an investor faces, is totally ignored. What's that? The pre-open
> gap and the "halt".
>
> The other morning CHIR was halted for trading and this is what
> brought this up. Hey Spitzer, what would you say about a system
> that allows people to invest their money for a 13 hour period and
> then cannot make any adjustments. Meanwhile, if there is news
> concerning one of the stocks in that market, the market makers can
> adjust the price up or down to whatever level they please and the
> investor can do nothing about it?
>
> Well that would be illegal as heck! I think that's what any law
> enforcement official might say. But the fact is that once the
> afterhours market closes on the stock exchange, you better say your
> prayers that nothing "bad" is found out about your stock. Because
> before the next days open, the market makers of that stock can
> price it at any level they feel will allow them to conduct an
> "orderly market". That's pure BS of the richest kind and should put
> most of the market makers in jail. Period.
>
> Let's suppose you buy the XYZ company at 3 pm on a Tuesday because
> they look like they are breaking out. You bought in at 50 dollars a
> share, and when the final bell rang you were up to 50.50. Life is
> good. You take the wife out, play with the kids, etc, etc, and go
> to bed. The next morning you wake up, toss on the news and hear that
> XYZ has been implicated in helping Alqueda hit the US. It's
> indicated to open at 20 dollars. Where'd the 30 dollar difference
> go? "Poof" is where it went. The market makers don't want to eat
> all the shares that will be coming their way, so they just pick a
> price that they think will keep "X" amount of stock coming at them
> and they have to buy it for a loss.
>
> I say "too bad for them". If they want to play market maker, they
> should be involved in the risk of promoting that company. If the
> company implodes, maybe they should have done better homework
> before signing on to sell the stock to the public. But no, it
> doesn't work that way. They get to walk away clean, often actually
> richer than they started, while the poor schmucks that bought the
> stock the day before are nursing a 30 dollar a share loss. That's
> purely criminal, and you can bet your you know what that Spitzer and
> all his cronies will never address that.
>
> I'm not against halting a stock. I really am not, but and this is
> important. I think a stock should be halted for "news pending or
> breaking" and there should be a period of no activity for the news
> to be spread and then the stock should be opened at the same price
> it closed. If a million investors scramble to dump the shares and
> the market makers are under pressure, well that's too bad. Why do
> they get to take no risk whatsoever and the investing public gets
> screwed? The same reason you'll never hear an analyst scream "sell
> your stocks", they only promote buying. The fact is that Wall
> Street is the biggest rigged game on the planet.
>
> http://clix.to/wallmann
>
> ----------
>
> Keep an eye on Medimune (MEDI) because of their nasal flu vaccine.
> CHIR is a major manufacturer, but they are a bit behind schedule.
> Overall, all the flu shot, nasal flue vaccine people should perk
> up, including IDBE! They shipped a ton of vaccine to the Canadian
> government and they are expanding their operation so they can ship
> to the US. This group will probably make advances, especially when
> the media starts hyping the flu shot season.
>
> --------------------
>
> The thing that intrigues me about IDBE isn't the actual drugs they
> are playing with, although it's interesting. No what gets me
> interested in them is the fact that they have designed a very
> interesting method of "taking" drugs by inhaling them. We profiled
> this outfit over a year ago when it became clear that their
> delivery method was shown to work, and now the military has just
> granted them some 5 million dollars to make a nasal vaccine for
> SARS. If they pull this off and all goes well, I can't even imagine
> the other contracts that will come down the pike. Yes, we like
> IDBE.
>
> http://clix.to/wallmann
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/zMEolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Metastockusers/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|