|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
The figures were just given as an exercise, Ajay. I get results in
proportion to those figures with 25 year backtesting. But that's
not important.
Which is better, the #W/#L, the bigger %profit/trade, the bigger %profit/day.
Or what?
Bodaire
------------
Ajay Joglekar wrote:
Two things here:
1.What is the time frame over which u tested this?
Test the systems over a longer range and see if u get significantly
different results.
2.Are the trades automated?I mean are you trading with no manual
interference or do u take signals and then put order to the broker
urself using ur phone or using a mouse click?
Here if u are trading manually(as against automated) then number
of
trades would be a major factor.I like to have the least effort
with
max output :)
-Ajay
----- Original Message -----
From: Bodaire <bodaire88@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 01:22:50 -0400
Subject: [EquisMetaStock Group] Which is Better?
To: EquisMetaStock <equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, MetastockUsers
<metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I've been thinking about this question and I can't
decide which is better. The figures are for 1.00
Lots per trade with no MM. I don't know which
would give better results with MM. Here are some
sample figures for A, B and C:
%Profit A)
48 B) 65 C) 80
#Trades A) 12
B) 18 C) 25
#W/#L A)
1.87 B) 1.98 C) 2.79
%Prof/Trade A) 4.00 B) 3.51 C) 3.21
%Prof/Day A) 1.49 B) 2.01 C) 2.50
What's more important in the long run? Making more
money per trading day (1 week=5days)? Making more
money per trade with less trades? The better W/L
ratio? Something else?
Bodaire
-----------
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|