[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [EquisMetaStock Group] Reuters Futures Data & Downloader



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




Your welcome to disagree Jay, but it doesn't 
make you right, nor does it mean you cant trade CC, nor does it mean UA creates 
flawed charts.  
You need to seriously think about the words 
you use, and differentiate between FACT and your perceived lack of respect for 
the use of CC's.
Just because you say that a back adjusted CC 
can't possibly give meaningful results because it would have to roll 7 times is 
simply wrong
by a magnitude. In fact it isn't wrong at 
all.  In  fact you can trade it just as is. In fact is gives exactly 
the price relativities you would trade 
in real life. If you wish to argue that it 
wont create a REAL chart in the sense that each contract month is quite separate 
from each other (
as distinct say from an Index contract) then 
you might be right, but that's merely a personal opinion of your. 
<BLOCKQUOTE 
>
  
  <FONT 
  face=Tahoma>-----Original Message-----From: Jay T 
  [mailto:JaysTownsend@xxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, 21 May 2004 1:59 
  AMTo: equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: Re: 
  [EquisMetaStock Group] Reuters Futures Data & 
  Downloader
  
  <<The only way you can do any 
  statistically meaningful system testing is usingback-adjusted continuous 
  contracts. See Schwager et al. The individualcontracts don't give you a 
  long enough data series. Nothing is perfect.Spliced contracts give you 
  price/resistance but jumps between contracts.Back-adjusted avoids the 
  jumps, gives you results that are very close toreal trading results and 
  works for system testing - but not 
  forresistance/support.>><FONT 
  face="Courier New">
   
  I simply don't agree.  There is absolutely 
  no way for a "back adjusted" continuous contract to give meaningful historical 
  data.  If you look at grains, for example, they have 7 or more contracts 
  per year that means you have to make adjustments 7 times in each years data, 
  for however many years you "test."  If you've looked at individual 
  historical contracts you will find that many of them have a personality - 
  that's what Moore Research depends on.
   
  If you in fact want to back test long strings of 
  real data, go to cash, but cash data often doesn't represent future's 
  data.
   
  If your system works, use it.
   
  Jay
  







Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


  ADVERTISEMENT 












Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/ 
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.