|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Both work as volume and accumulation indicators and some what as
trend indicators (trend change not trend strength), but you will find
that one will work better on one group of stocks and the other will
better on another group of stocks. Then there's the issue of
optimization.
Read about them on the internet. Read every article you can find so
you can see the various ways people use them and along with the
drawbacks. You can also read my reviews of ICE. It is good for
testing those two indicators.
http://www.equis.com/Education/TAAZ/?page=82
http://www.equis.com/Education/TAAZ/?page=41
http://www.incrediblecharts.com/technical/chaikin_money_flow.htm
http://www.paritech.com/education/technical/indicators/strength/chaiki
n1.asp
JO
--- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "BillPritJr" <billpritjr@xxxx>
wrote:
> What does the audience use and why?
>
> On Balance Volume
>
> (or)
>
> Chaikin Money Flow
>
>
> In Murphy's TA books, he only mentions OBV, no mention of CMF. In
> Prings book, CMF is lightly touched on.
>
> In my own testing, CMF appears to be a potentially powerful
> secondary tool to confirm trend
>
> comments?
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/BefplB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|