PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
....I am with Henry and you if it comes to any Legal issues etc...
together we stand on this better it will be...
Henry has done a great service for Metastock users and I am with him
on this....
anil
--- In Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Preston Umrysh
<pumrysh@xxxx>" <pumrysh@xxxx> wrote:
> Jayson,
>
> I don't know, this appears to be a serious threat! I think we
should
> begin to consider a legal defense fund for Henry.
>
> BTW: I find it quite intrigueing that "millions" are aware of this.
>
> Preston
>
>
> --- In Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Jayson" <jcasavant@xxxx>
> wrote:
> > Oh, for crying out loud!!!
> >
> > spam ( P ) Pronunciation Key (spm)n.
> > Unsolicited e-mail, often of a commercial nature, sent
> indiscriminately to
> > multiple mailing lists, individuals, or newsgroups; junk e-mail.
> > Did anyone solicit your email?? Since you are asking for personal
> > information at your site (which opens the door to your selling
that
> > information) can you deny commercial possibilities? As you have
> posted to
> > newsgroups which re-mail to multiple individuals can you
possibly
> deny that
> > your mail has been sent to multiple individuals?
> >
> > Get over it! the clear majority of users responding to
> Henry's "Silly little
> > poll" do not want to see your your posts. There is no defamation
> your posts
> > have clearly met the definition of Spam and therefore you have
met
> the
> > definition of "Spammer" Get over it. and enjoy this and other
sites
> as
> > Anibal Archenti but not as a representative of
WWW.Stockpamdic.com.
> >
> > BTW .com clearly indicates a Commercial presence
> >
> >
> > Jayson
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Anibal Archenti [mailto:anibalarchenti@x...]
> > Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 10:08 AM
> > To: Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Metastockusers-
> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [Metastockusers] RE:www.stockspamdic.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Mr. Kaczmarczyk doesn't realize that to label another person at
the
> open
> > web, where everybody can read his opinion, is a defamation and
> therefore it
> > is against the law.
> > I can't understand how a so negligent person may be owner of a
site
> related
> > to metastock, or any other serious subject at Yahoo groups.
> > Probably his fault would not be serious if he express his
opinions
> inside
> > his group, but when he label another person in a free access
page
> he risks
> > to receive a letter from a lawyer.
> > It doesn't matter if my methodology is or not relate to
metastock,
> it doesn'
> > t matter if it is a black box and it doesn't matter if I use a
> server in
> > Haiti or in China, the situation is that Mr. Kaczmarczyk is not
> free to
> > express his opinion about my person where millions of other
people
> can
> > access to it.
> > I will not write my opinion of Mr. Kaczmarczyk neither at the
web
> nor at his
> > group because I respect the individuals rights and I don't want
to
> offend
> > him in public.
> > I think he haven't the courage to recognize he made a mistake
and to
> > apologize and he hide himself behind a useless opinion poll
(even
> if
> > everybody in metastockusers agree with him that doesn't give him
> the right
> > to insult another person in public)
> > Thanks to those who have given a good opinion about my site
> answering his
> > useless opinion poll, and of course this will be my last
> communication to
> > this group, I'm sorry you have to tolerate this kind of
moderator.
> Of course
> > all of you are still welcome to stockspamdic
> >
> > Mr. Kaczmarczyk: this is the last time I ask you in a polite way
> that you
> > erase your opinion about me from free access pages in the web.
> >
> > Anibal Archenti
> > www.stockspamdic.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|