[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: System low on resources



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


Excellent contribution Wilty : Thanks 
!
 
Theo Lockefeer
 
 
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
  wilty 
  van rees 
  To: <A title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:32 
  AM
  Subject: Re: System low on 
resources
  
  The explanation of Jay Cruce is correct. If you 
  have enough of RAM, the problem probably is the System 
  Resources.
   
  Win9x and Win ME reserve a fixed 
  (small) amount of memory for the System Resources. Programs should 
  release all the used System Resources, so it can be used again. A lot of 
  programs (among them Metastock) however fail to do this 
  correctly. Messages like 'Your system is low on resources, please 
  close some charts ...'  point to exhausted System Resources.
   
  Memory boosters like Free Memory Pro, Memokit, 
  Memturbo and a lot of others can free your RAM. However they can't do 
  anything with the System Resources.
   
  Some websites that mention the 
  problem:
  <A 
  href="http://www.infinisource.com/techfiles/win-resources.html";>http://www.infinisource.com/techfiles/win-resources.html
  <A 
  href="http://www.releaseram.com/support.htm#RESOURCES";>http://www.releaseram.com/support.htm#RESOURCES (website 
  of Free Memory Pro)
  <A 
  href="http://tweakhomepc.virtualave.net/thpc.html";>http://tweakhomepc.virtualave.net/thpc.html
   
  Win2000 and Win XP handle the System Resources in 
  another way. There is no longer a fixed amount of memory for the System 
  Resources, these operating systems use RAM memory to supply extra 
  memory for the System Resources.
   
  Samary 
  Marysamars (Metastockusers Yahoogroup) reported that the problem 
  disappeared by installing win2000:
  "Installing 
  WIN2000. The problem quit, it works 6 hours in real time.Only metastock 
  seems to drag a litle'.
  <FONT face=Arial 
size=2> 
  To 
  summarize:
   
  Win2000 seems the better operating system 
  when you have serious problems with low system resources. No Win2000 
  user on the list reported problems in this area.
   
  Win XP should handle the system resources the way 
  Win2000 does. However Igor Devisscher had a lot of problems. This brings up 
  the question: 'Is Metastock ready for Win XP?'.  The Equis website 
  doesn't mention Win XP. Has anyone by accidence contacted Equis about this 
  item?Good 
  luck,
  Wilty
   
   
  <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
  style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    <DIV 
    style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
    Gene Ricci 
    To: <A title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 5:08 
    AM
    Subject: Re: System low on 
    resources
    
    I have 7.21 installed, just upgraded from 
    7.2.... my original installation was 7.2 . 
    I just went and opened 18 charts; had Excel 
    and Word open plus had Outlook Express receiving mail.. no 
    problems.
     
    Gene
    <BLOCKQUOTE 
    style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      <DIV 
      style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
      Robert 
      Duplain 
      To: <A title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      Cc: <A 
      title=igor.devisscher@xxxxxxxxxx 
      href="mailto:igor.devisscher@xxxxxxxxxx";>igor.devisscher@xxxxxxxxxx ; 
      <A title=hwrichards@xxxxxxxxx 
      href="mailto:hwrichards@xxxxxxxxx";>hwrichards@xxxxxxxxx ; <A 
      title=genr@xxxxxxxxxx href="mailto:genr@xxxxxxxxxx";>genr@xxxxxxxxxx 
      
      Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 9:10 
      PM
      Subject: RE: System low on 
      resources
      Hi all,We may be near to the cause of the problem but I 
      miss some informationIgor, you have the problem under W2k. What is 
      your version of Metastock ?Gene, you have no problem under W2k.  
      What is your version of Metastock?Holland, you have no problem under 
      W2k.  What is your version of 
      Metastock?ThanksRobert -----Message 
      d'origine-----De : <A 
      href="mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]De la part deIgor 
      DevisscherEnvoyé : 4 décembre, 2001 01:07À : <A 
      href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxObjet 
      : RE: System low on resourcesHy Robert,You are lucky that you 
      can open 15 charts. When I open 3 charts with 3expert advisors and NO 
      other programs, after 3 hours my pc is Low onresources. I have PIII 
      256Ram and windows XP. And I'm not alone who hasthis problem. The 
      problem is MS..!Greetings igor-----Original 
      Message-----From: <A 
      href="mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
      On Behalf Of Robert DuplainSent: maandag 3 december 2001 8:16To: 
      <A 
      href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: 
      System low on resourcesHi all,I just upgraded my 
      computer for a Pentium 4, 256 meg RAM.  I'm runningMetastock 6.52 
      on Windows Me.When I open numerous (let say 15) charts in MS while 
      running some fewotherprograms, I still get a "System low on 
      resources" message and no otherchartcan be opened.Is there 
      anybody experienced such a problem.  I can't believed I 
      stilllackon resources.Is the problem with Metastock 6.52 
      or  Windows Me ?Should I upgrade to MS EOD 7.2 or to Windows 2000 
      to solve the problem ?Thanks for you 
      helpRobert