[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Weekly/Monthly data



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


One can envision a zillion permutations.  The 
question is which, if any, have any effect.  Once an effect is seen, then 
one can worry about the right formulation.
 
Bill
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
  Lionel 
  Issen 
  To: <A title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:10 
  AM
  Subject: Re: Weekly/Monthly data
  
  Some years back I read  that Wed close was more important than 
  Friday's close.  Why not use a running 5 day O H L C?
  Lionel Issen<A 
  href="mailto:lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
  style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    <DIV 
    style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
    wavemechanic 
    
    To: <A title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 7:53 
    AM
    Subject: Re: Weekly/Monthly data
    
    I have no idea if it makes more sense to use Wed 
    or Fri close, etc., but I have read that the Friday close is the most 
    significant close of the week.  Can't prove it and doubt if the author 
    can, but it is certainly when market makers, etc. square up their 
    books, which might be significant in terms of zeroing in on 
    value.
     
    Bill
    <BLOCKQUOTE 
    style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      <DIV 
      style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
      <A title=Roberts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      href="mailto:Roberts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>Simon Roberts 
      To: <A title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:44 
      AM
      Subject: Re: Weekly/Monthly 
data
      Sean,Interesting point. This reminds me of the 
      arguments for and against plottinga moving average where we commonly 
      do so now.  If considered logically, andfrom the mathematical 
      viewpoint of what the average represents, then theaverage should 
      really be plotted at the point on the chart which representsthe mid 
      point of the average, and not the last point, as common practicetoday, 
      and since the beginning of charting.So for a 21 day simple MA you 
      would plot it at the middle pont of theaverage, that is today minus 11 
      days.It of course raises more interresting questions as to where to 
      plot weightedaverages, or exponentials. Presumably at the point 
      representing the centreof gravity of the data, not the mid 
      point.  Not very mainstream, and notmuch help.So for 
      weekly data, a more representative figure might be the close 
      onWednesday, or even an average of the weekly closes. However, usually 
      aweekly figure is used where less information is needed, not more, 
      hence theclose of the week.Simon-----Original 
      Message-----From: Sean Taylor <<A 
      href="mailto:cloudnine@xxxxxxxxxxxx";>cloudnine@xxxxxxxxxxxx>To: 
      Metastock List <<A 
      href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Date: 
      21 August 2001 01:35Subject: Weekly/Monthly data>Is 
      anybody out there using weekly (or even monthly data)?>>It 
      occurred to me that if using weekly data for a system, is it truely 
      a>reflection of the weeks activity to go off the weeks close?  
      Might it be>better to perform some sort of average on the weeks 
      data to better reflect>the weeks activity?  i.e. the average 
      close for the week.>Metastock takes the Friday close and uses this 
      for weekly data.>>I raise this because I've come up with a 
      system that works well on the>Russell 2000 weekly but not 
      daily.>>It just seems that the data I'm basing the test off 
      could vary as easily as>an individual 
      day.>>Thoughts?>>Thanks,>Sean>>