|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
It works with Reuters and Esignal. They support Dial Data and Telescan but
these 2 vendors do not show up when you use the Downloader and do a
New/Security/Lookup. If they support the same symbols as Reuters does, it
shouldn't be a problem. I know Reuters puts a # in front of Mutual Funds and
they all use different symbols for their indexes, bonds (if available), and
Futures. If you know the symbol(s), you can manually add them to the symbol
data base. The back of the Downloader manual lists the various formats for
each vendor.
Allan Wade
Phoenix, AZ
email: allanwade@xxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Mikey
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 2:18 PM
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Equis have updated their Symbol database at last ***CAUTION***
is it true that this symbol universe only works with Reuters???
Allan Wade wrote:
> I wish those goof off's ay Equis would get their act straightened out.
This
> means that I went through a reinstall (and indicator/system tester
> conversion) for nothing. They could have just emailed me some/any correct
> version of the file. I guess I just fell for the 2 oldest tricks in the
tech
> support book....."Reinstall it"...and "it will be fixed in the next
> release".
> Amibroker is looking better and better.
>
> Allan Wade
> Phoenix, AZ
> email: allanwade@xxxxxxxx
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of neo
> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 4:46 AM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Equis have updated their Symbol database at last
***CAUTION***
>
> This is an email from MS support:
>
> The problem was with the symbol database files on the server. During the
> migration from one server to another, these files were damaged. This
> problem was not specific to any one version. The problem has been
> resolved. You should be able to update the symbol database from any
> version, again.
>
> Thanks,
> Lynn
|