|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Yes that is true ! And no one is forcing to do the upgrade. But many
software houses charge different upgrade prices in order to and from what
version you are upgrading. So example it would be more expensive to upgrade
from 7.03 to 8 then from 7,2 to 8. I'm not sure if Equis works this way but
most of them do, so then you will have to pay more. Although you didn't
used that version.
Greetings
Mickey
P.S I have a replay from Equis but in order to post it here I'm asking for
his permission. And there he stated that not all systems are password
protected. The system test are not protected although the 10 multiple
exploration explorer scans ARE password protected
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Al Taglavore
> Sent: vrijdag 30 maart 2001 8:09
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Metastock V7.2
>
>
> Oh, I think you are so right, Ron. I would certainly like to
> read of the
> experiences of those who have opted to purchase 7.2 and their
> comments on
> the new additions.....good, bad or indifferent.
>
> My puzzlement with the posts that were appearing was why
> throw rocks at
> Equis if what you are using is doing the job you paid for. I
> sent Equis an
> e-mail to inquire what the cost to upgrade the ver 7.03
> I purchased on 12-11-00. They told me $59.95 for ver 7.2. I
> am happy with
> 7.03, it is mine, it does what I want it to do, I get
> support, and no one
> is forcing me to purchase the latest version. If many of
> the users on
> this list were to comment favorably on the new version and it did some
> things I felt would justify the cost, I would make the
> purchase. If not, I
> keep what I got.
>
> Now, see anything good on the charts that could make us some money?
>
> Al Taglavore
>
>
> ----------
> > From: Ron Scott <ron@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: Metastock V7.2
> > Date: Thursday, March 29, 2001 2:50 PM
> >
> > Al-
> >
> > As for the uproar, it has gotten a little overdone. None
> the less, I
> think
> > many people myself included question Equis' motivations. In
> any event, I
> > agree with you. Staying with the stable version 7.03 makes
> the most sense
> at
> > this time. It would still be good to hear from those who have
> successfully
> > installed and used 7.2.
> >
> > Thanks-
> >
> > Ron Scott
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Al Taglavore
> > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 11:10 AM
> > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: Metastock V7.2
> >
> >
> > I do not understand why this upgrade has caused such a
> storm of dialog.
> If
> > your present version is working, you were satisfied with
> the software
> when
> > you bought it, and it is still going to be serviced by tech
> support, then
> > what is the problem?
> >
> > I upgraded from ver 6.52 to ver 7.03 in December 2000 and I
> am very happy
> > with it. I think it is the best since ver 5.11. It works
> the way I want
> > it too. Equis supports the product. I got equal value for
> dollar spent.
> I
> > have no complaint.
> >
> > I am not being a contrarian. I am not tooting Equis' horn.
> I truly do
> not
> > understand the uproar.
> >
> > Al Taglavore
> > ----------
> > > From: Michel Amelinckx <Michel.Amelinckx@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: RE: Metastock V7.2
> > > Date: Thursday, March 29, 2001 10:18 AM
> > >
> > > You see, what I told you guys. My predictions where
> correct !!! I
> can't
> > > believe they are not a shame PUSHING us into buying systems (black
> boxes)
> > > who are useless. This should be sold as ADD-ON
> separately like the one
> > of
> > > John Murphy, although this one is not included this one
> is a USABLE
> one.
> > >
> > > I believe this upgrade is the clearest way of milking the
> cow and is
> > > absolutely useless!!
> >
> > SNIP SNIP SNIP==============
>
|