|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Search for Macroscheduller : deleted it from disk
but was the best i ever did see.
Theo Lockefeer
----- Original Message -----
From: "eugenefongdere" <eugenefongdere@xxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: Any software out there that would do my mouse-clicks for me? <-
Thanks to everyone on this Valentine's Day!
> Can you provide me the web of your choice.Thanks,
> Best regards,
> gordon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivo Karindi <ivo@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; OmegaList (E-mail)
> <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 8:38 AM
> Subject: RE: Any software out there that would do my mouse-clicks for me?
<-
> Thanks to everyone on this Valentine's Day!
>
>
> >Thanks to everyone who took time to help me out with some very good
> >suggestions here. Since I tested out several programs, thought that I
just
> >let everyone know what I found out.
> >
> >I was surprised to learn that there is actually a lot of different
products
> >in this category. After reading about various options, decided to
download
> >and test out the following:
> >
> >1) AIM Keys
> >2) AutoMate 4
> >3) EZ Macros
> >4) MacroExpress
> >
> >First an explanation why I was looking for something like this: need to
run
> >a series of tests on a series of futures contracts using a machinery
> >composed of TS, EL Editor, text files outputted by TS, MS Excel, and MS
> >Access. I needed something that can automatically do some EL editing (or
> MS
> >formulas every now and then), run a test, import the results into Excel,
> and
> >store the results in Access. Rather than spending countless of hours
doing
> >all this manually, I wanted to find something that will do the labor for
me
> >so I can concentrate on the test results.
> >
> >After testing all of the above programs, I decided to go with AutoMate 4.
> >The main reason is "bells and whistles" that come with it, primarily the
> >options to run "do" loops with custom variables, write scripts in Basic
for
> >tasks that are not already included, and the extensive resource base on
the
> >web. I also like the fact that AutoMate most closely resembles "object
> >oriented" programming approach, the objects being various applications
and
> >Windows components.
> >
> >Thanks again to everyone who took time to respond!
> >(Not affiliated etc., just reasoning about my personal decision.)
> >
> >Ivo
> >
> >
> >
>
>
|