|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
The Easy Language in Trade Station is such a language. The TAS program had
a programming language that looked like a subset of Pascal. You are correct,
if a programming language has an interface with MS, we can use the whole
language not just a subset.
Why should we have to buy and learn to use MSK and powerbasic?
Lionel Issen
lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: "michael" <mslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 7:14 AM
Subject: RE: new user questions
>
>
> "The only way to use complex indicators in MS is to have them built into
the
> program. MS would be a very powerful program if it had a more functional
> "formula language". Something like visual basic or a subset of C++ or
> visual C would do it."
>
>
> MS has a the ability to build anything through the DLL function and MSX
> add-on. Why do you need a subset of C++ when you can use full C++,
Delphi,
> or any other DLL capable lanquage to build anything you want? You could
> even build a separate program that uses MetaStock Data and builds the
Price
> by Volume that's being talked about in a separate window.
>
> I think the people who are complaining about the MS formula language want
> something that does not exist anywhere. They want the easy to use, simple
> function commands to do incredibly complex stuff. If you want complex
stuff
> it takes a complex programming language. If you want ease of use, then
you
> want a simple set of function commands. MS has both. So I don't know
what
> people are complaining about.
>
> Michael
>
|