|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Thank you for taking the time to post this for the rest of us. It would have
been nice if Equis had responded to my request for tech support on this, as
I sent them 2 e-mails.
Ron Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of TraderJoe
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 9:55 AM
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Buff Moving Averages Problem
Just got this from Support:
There was a typo in this issue. The formula as printed was:
X := Input( "Time Periods",1, 500, 25 );
Sum( V * C, X ) / (Cum( V ) - Ref( Cum(V), X ))
The last line needs to have a minus sign added in front of the last X. The
correct version looks like this:
X := Input( "Time Periods",1, 500, 25 );
Sum( V * C, X ) / (Cum( V ) - Ref( Cum(V), -X ))
---
Joe
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:54:41
Lynn Dufrenne wrote:
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: j seed [mailto:jseed_10@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 12:46 PM
>To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: Buff Moving Averages Problem
>
>
>Ron,
>I thought it was. Look at the ref statement.
>
>J.
>
>
>>From: "Ron Scott" <ron@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Subject: Buff Moving Averages Problem
>>Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:27:40 -0700
>>
>>Has anyone programmed the Buff volume-weighted moving average from this
>>month's TASC? I have, and it looks very strange. It plots with huge
>>divergence from the Arms volume-adjusted moving average which is supplied
>>with Metastock. Something seems very wrong here. I'm wondering if the
>>formula supplied in TASC Trader's Tips for Metastock is somehow incorrect.
>>I'd appreciate any help on this.
>>
>>Thanks-
>>
>>Ron Scott
>>
>>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
Get your small business started at Lycos Small Business at
http://www.lycos.com/business/mail.html
|