|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
What is the ARMS system? Is this the very expensive Omnitrader add-on? Can
you tell us more about it?
Thanks, neo
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Michel Amelinckx
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2000 4:51 PM
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: MS Portfolio Manager
I see no one who talks here about Omnitrader uses the ARMS system for
Omnitrader, because then you would talk differently. I believe this gives
far more accurate signals and has a higher Avg per trade. And it is not
optimised.
I'm interested to see if this message will arrive because tried to sent a
chart of the Effratio I created before, without success.
Mickey
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of jhmtn
> Sent: zaterdag 2 december 2000 23:07
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: MS Portfolio Manager
>
>
> I know this is a Metastock forum, and Omnitrader cannot do what what
> Metastock can in some areas, but I feel that I should say a
> kind word about
> Omnitrader. I own both products, MS ver &.x Pro and
> Omnitrader at the EOD
> version for stocks.
>
> As has been mentioned, the Portfolio Manager is nice. The
> real strength of
> Omnitrader, IMHO, is for a true beginner to computerized TA
> to learn how to
> create a trading system. Even though I had EOD MS from about
> ver 6.x, it
> was far too compilcated for me to master its subtleties with
> my 55-70 hour a
> week job. Omnitrader was then purchased EOD to learn what
> was going on.
> Then, by tuning off all the tests but specific ones in
> Omnitrader I was able
> to develop an understanding of a trading system. I then
> ported it into MS
> and once running there, tweaked it further. The templates
> that Omnitrader
> had enabled me to learn computerized trading system thinking.
> I think that
> for a beginner, and the low EOD stock model cost (and note,
> they have given
> me free upgrades for several years now!) the product is an
> excellent tudor
> for computerized TA system thinking.
>
> I still run omni trader when I want to try a new combination
> of indicators
> and conditions for entry and exits. It is a good system
> development tool.
> I use Metastock for trading.
>
> Hope this helps! ..................... John
>
> > The Portfolio Manager is not separate that I am aware of
> and though I have
> > not used it extensively the software is probably worth the
> price just for
> > the PM. If you compare the price to, say, Murphy's Pattern
> Recognition it
> is
> > a bargain just for the PM.
> >
> > neo
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of T.E.M. Lockefeer
> > Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2000 9:55 AM
> > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: MS Portfolio Manager
> >
> >
> > Neo :
> >
> > Heard about Omnitrader from someone else the same about
> > the "poor" stockpicking and that the Omnitrader people
> worked first for
> > equis.
> > Portfolio manager is not a single module for sale i suppose ?
> >
> > Theo.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "neo" <neo1@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2000 1:52 PM
> > Subject: MS Portfolio Manager
> >
> >
> > > A day or two ago someone asked about a Portfolio Manager
> for MS. I have
> > > Omnitrader. For me, it was not very helpful in picking
> stocks but it has
> a
> > > great Portfolio Manager that is compatable with MS and
> it's data. One of
> > the
> > > nice things is that it allows multiple stops including
> entry, trailing,
> > and
> > > inactivity. It also allows one to include and edit the
> cash part of your
> > > portfolio. It has the best Portfolio Manager that I have
> seen. I am
> going
> > to
> > > re-load it and use it just for the Portfolio Manager.
> > >
> > > Hope this helps
> > >
> > > neo
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|