[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Dumb questions



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

It also depends on the time frame you are trading.  A correction in one time 
frame (long) might be a reverasal in another (short time).

Dan


>From: Mullin285@xxxxxxx
>Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: Dumb questions
>Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2000 09:41:45 EST
>
>Hey!!! I wanted to ask that question. No wait, it's too good a question for
>me to ask. :)
>
>Just kidding of course.
>
>Chris
>
>In a message dated Thu, 2 Nov 2000 12:26:25 AM Eastern Standard Time,
>"Vignesh" <vignesh@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
><< speaking of dumb questions how about "are there any rules that one can 
>use
>to decide when a correction has turned into a reversal?"
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <Mullin285@xxxxxxx>
>To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 9:24 PM
>Subject: Re: too much for me--lets get on with it
>
>
> > I certainly do not want to be negative or keep any negativity alive but
>..
> > IMHO the issue is not related to technical disagreements. It seems to me
>that
> > it is much more related to civilness, humaness ...
> > Forums like this are designed for exchanges of ideas, preferably in a
>civil
> > and nurturing manner. When people are criticized, rebuked and called 
>nasty
> > names for asking a question or giving their opinion, there is a tendency
>to
> > stifle a lot of other peoples contributions.
> > I am not trying to keep this going, just trying to ensure the issue is
> > defined properly.
> > I feel that the best way for me to contribute is to ask the dumb 
>questions
> > that everybody else is too embarassed to ask. So ... let me go think of
>some
> > really dumb questions now. Any ideas from any one? :)
> > Chris
> >
> > In a message dated Wed, 1 Nov 2000  6:48:35 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> > "Vignesh" <vignesh@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > << Hey, lets just get on with it ok? whoever is at fault, there is a lot
>more
> > to be gained by exchange of good ideas (how will one know something is
>good
> > unless there is something less good to compare it with?) and a whole lot
>to
> > be learnt.
> >
> > Lets all continue to make this a good active vibrant and intelligent
>forum.
> >
> >
> > Vignesh
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Daniel Martinez <DanM@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 7:13 AM
> > Subject: Re: Too much for me
> >
> >
> > > I wouldn't worry about it.  As long as Equis's MetaStock program is
> > popular,
> > > there will be a MetaStock ListServ.  The only way this List will
>disappear
> > > would be if no one purchased the product any more.  There will always 
>be
> > > changeovers in people for whatever reasons.  Some will go broke, some
>will
> > move
> > > on to better programs, some will find better forums such as Silicon
> > Investor,
> > > etc...
> > >
> > > Let's just ignore the negative and focus on building our skills in
> > MetaStock
> > > and TA in general.  I have much to contribute and learn.  I know 
>others
> > here
> > > will do the same.
> > >
> > > Daniel.
> > >
> > >
> > > Ron Scott wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is exactly what I've been thinking would happen, that people
>would
> > be
> > > > driven off or leave in disgust. This list of traders has been ruined
>by
> > the
> > > > few who can't handle the fact that others have different views.
> > Complaining
> > > > to Equis about the problem didn't do any good, so maybe you should 
>go.
> > > > There is a very uncomfortable feeling about this list, and posting 
>to
>it
> > > > takes almost as much guts as making a trade!  But at least you won't
> > find
> > > > support for an unprofitable idea! hahaha   However, there are some
>very
> > > > smart and nice people on the list, I guess they just have developed 
>a
> > thick
> > > > skin.
> > > >
> > > > Ron Scott
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Mark Thompson
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 7:57 AM
> > > > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: Too much for me
> > > >
> > > > Would someone please tell me where I can sign up for realtraders?  I
> > can't
> > > > take this anymore.  It is time to make a switch.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: <Mullin285@xxxxxxx>
> > > > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 7:12 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: Blind bats, old ladies, and one giant turd.
> > > >
> > > > > I have to agree, sad to say. I feel many folks are probably 
>nervous
> > about
> > > > > getting whiplashed by some of the vicious, obnoxiousness that 
>often
> > times
> > > > > stinks up so many posts on this list.
> > >
> >
> >  >>
> >
> >
>
>  >>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.