|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hey!!! I wanted to ask that question. No wait, it's too good a question for
me to ask. :)
Just kidding of course.
Chris
In a message dated Thu, 2 Nov 2000 12:26:25 AM Eastern Standard Time,
"Vignesh" <vignesh@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
<< speaking of dumb questions how about "are there any rules that one can use
to decide when a correction has turned into a reversal?"
----- Original Message -----
From: <Mullin285@xxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: too much for me--lets get on with it
> I certainly do not want to be negative or keep any negativity alive but
..
> IMHO the issue is not related to technical disagreements. It seems to me
that
> it is much more related to civilness, humaness ...
> Forums like this are designed for exchanges of ideas, preferably in a
civil
> and nurturing manner. When people are criticized, rebuked and called nasty
> names for asking a question or giving their opinion, there is a tendency
to
> stifle a lot of other peoples contributions.
> I am not trying to keep this going, just trying to ensure the issue is
> defined properly.
> I feel that the best way for me to contribute is to ask the dumb questions
> that everybody else is too embarassed to ask. So ... let me go think of
some
> really dumb questions now. Any ideas from any one? :)
> Chris
>
> In a message dated Wed, 1 Nov 2000 6:48:35 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> "Vignesh" <vignesh@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> << Hey, lets just get on with it ok? whoever is at fault, there is a lot
more
> to be gained by exchange of good ideas (how will one know something is
good
> unless there is something less good to compare it with?) and a whole lot
to
> be learnt.
>
> Lets all continue to make this a good active vibrant and intelligent
forum.
>
>
> Vignesh
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Daniel Martinez <DanM@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 7:13 AM
> Subject: Re: Too much for me
>
>
> > I wouldn't worry about it. As long as Equis's MetaStock program is
> popular,
> > there will be a MetaStock ListServ. The only way this List will
disappear
> > would be if no one purchased the product any more. There will always be
> > changeovers in people for whatever reasons. Some will go broke, some
will
> move
> > on to better programs, some will find better forums such as Silicon
> Investor,
> > etc...
> >
> > Let's just ignore the negative and focus on building our skills in
> MetaStock
> > and TA in general. I have much to contribute and learn. I know others
> here
> > will do the same.
> >
> > Daniel.
> >
> >
> > Ron Scott wrote:
> >
> > > This is exactly what I've been thinking would happen, that people
would
> be
> > > driven off or leave in disgust. This list of traders has been ruined
by
> the
> > > few who can't handle the fact that others have different views.
> Complaining
> > > to Equis about the problem didn't do any good, so maybe you should go.
> > > There is a very uncomfortable feeling about this list, and posting to
it
> > > takes almost as much guts as making a trade! But at least you won't
> find
> > > support for an unprofitable idea! hahaha However, there are some
very
> > > smart and nice people on the list, I guess they just have developed a
> thick
> > > skin.
> > >
> > > Ron Scott
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Mark Thompson
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 7:57 AM
> > > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Too much for me
> > >
> > > Would someone please tell me where I can sign up for realtraders? I
> can't
> > > take this anymore. It is time to make a switch.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <Mullin285@xxxxxxx>
> > > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 7:12 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Blind bats, old ladies, and one giant turd.
> > >
> > > > I have to agree, sad to say. I feel many folks are probably nervous
> about
> > > > getting whiplashed by some of the vicious, obnoxiousness that often
> times
> > > > stinks up so many posts on this list.
> >
>
> >>
>
>
>>
|