|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I agree personal attacks have no place in a TA list. They serve no purpose.
They degrade the level of the discussion and stop others from contributing.
Because this is a public list and anyone can join, the only thing you can do is
ignore the negative and focus on what will help you become a better TA.
Speaking about TA, I did a search and LTRE was the highest performing stock today
with a gain of 30%... IN ONE DAY! If I could buy 3 stocks like LTRE, I could
retire in THREE (3) DAYS!! <VBG> LTRE, or LEARNING TREE INTL INC COM, of all
companies is at the top of my QP search results for today. My scan looks for
these QP criteria:
Nasdaq Common and (Close(-1) >= 5) and (Close(-100) > 0) and (Vol(-100) > 0) and
(MovAvg(0, 100, VOL) > 100000) and (SharesOut >= 18)
I uploaded the spreadsheet containing the QP 10/30 Daily Winners and MIN ROC
results. You can find it at my Yahoo! Briefcase:
http://briefcase.yahoo.com/pegasus65
The folder is "STOCKS" and the filename is "daily_and_min_roc.xls"
I am interested in hearing the opinions of the TA experts in this group.
I mentioned before how 2 HDD's makes scanning a breeze. Both 7200 RPM 30 GB
Maxtor's are so quiet, sometimes I forget I am even doing a scan. Also, the
speed is amazing. The ONLY way I can improve on the performance would be if I
purchased a Promise PCI IDE RAID card and used RAID 0.
Daniel.
Mullin285@xxxxxxx wrote:
> I have to agree, sad to say. I feel many folks are probably nervous about
> getting whiplashed by some of the vicious, obnoxiousness that often times
> stinks up so many posts on this list.
>
> When I first stopped in here for a visit. I thought there were big flame wars
> going on, only to realize that someone had simply asked a question or tried
> to answer one and got blasted for something. I don't know or care if someone
> is knowledgeable, if they can't respond without condescending attitudes and
> rude remarks, I personally can live fine without their help.
>
> At first, I hoped it was a language thing. It may be hard to come across like
> a nice guy if you are using languages that are not your primary language. I
> don't harbor that hope any longer, it seems some people really feel there are
> only 2 answers to every question. Their answers and the stupid,
> non-contributing, wrong, idiot answers.
>
> So tell me about those other groups, will ya ...
>
> Chris
>
> In a message dated Mon, 30 Oct 2000 3:46:17 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> "Groucho Markz" <grouchomarkz@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> << "Blind bats and old ladies have become List-members nowadays. "
>
> Ton,
>
> You have been the main reason this forum has turned into a toilet bowl.
> Your myopic view of the world, from your Eurocentric position, has driven
> the best and brightest to forums that would boot your ass off in a lightning
> second. I challenge you to try to become and remain a "realtraders.com"
> contributor for more than a few days (or any list that actually monitors
> it's posts). I can only surmise that you are allowed to continue your
> attacks because you have compromising pictures of Alan McNichols.
>
> Try not posting for a few weeks and we'll see if the TA discussions take on
> more meaningful content. I bet you can't..."ranters" seldom have the
> ability to control their endless dribble.
>
> Groucho
> "Quote me as saying I was misquoted."
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "A.J. Maas" <anthmaas@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Metastock-List" <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2000 5:00 AM
> Subject: Re: Simple question on Bollinger Bands
>
> Since these personal attacks continue, I see no further reason to continue
> in assisting anyone using the MSK or other programs related or to continue
> discussing any technical topics here. There are limits, and they have
> already
> been reached last Sept00. The past Oct00 month shoiwed only a slight
> improvement, but to minimal to be taken serious. Ce la vie!!!!{that's life}.
>
> Blind bats and old ladies have become List-members nowadays. Also
> the quality level of the mails sent and the included fantasies for contents
> lead
> me to assess that since earlier this year we're basicaly drifting towards a
> Walt
> Disney's equivelant "enjoy + entertainment"-List. {read: a common chat box}.
>
> One that also stands 180 degrees linea recta opposite from a well gaining
> $+'s Equis's "MSK + Technical Analysis"-List, eg the one that I joined
> several years ago.
> - - - - - - - - - - S N I P - - - - - - - - - -
|