|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I'm not sure that I completely understand your posting; however any
article(s) can be deleted from any folder. certain system folders cannot be
deleted, like inbox.
In OE if you want to delete articles in any folder do the following:
1. open the folder
2. highlight the item(s) that you want to delete
3. either press the delete key or click on the delete button on the tool
bar.
4. the item(s) is moved to the "deleted items" folder where it can be
completely deleted from your hard drive.
OE is a bit simple minded but it is adequate and the price is right.
Lionel Issen
lissen@xxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jossart Alain" <Alain.Jossart@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 4:25 AM
Subject: Re: Advanced Get versus MetaStock
OE does use separate files... but this software is definitely dumb at
managing big archives. For whatever reason, the designer decided it is
useful to scan a folder completely each time the user wants to have a look
at the last window of messages. Typical "brutal force". Oh yes, the user can
still get around this bug by folders multiplication.
OE is the same dumb software for Usenet news readings. Same systematic idiot
folder scan and no way to delete articles in the input folders. This is
really brilliant... now, you must use it since it is modern and
state-of-the-art technology. Always listen to the crowd.
" Slow... slowest ? ... slower always can " (c) MS
Alain.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Martinez" <DanM@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 9:14 PM
Subject: Re: Advanced Get versus MetaStock
> A.J.:
> my Netscape v4.75 has 150 MB in emails. I understand OE only uses one (1)
file for ALL its
> email. I decided against using OE for now. Also, I don't want to take
the time to migrate
> to OE. I want to spend all my spare time reviewing TA and running either
QP v2.x or
> MetaStock scans.
>
> Many other users on this ListServ don't want to get HTML from their
ListServ's because it
> bloats their email files and taxes their email 'Net connection.
>
> Daniel.
>
>
> "A.J. Maas" wrote:
>
> > Head+Shoulders(H,S)
> > Height(H)
> > Break(B)
> > Target(T)
> > NeckLine(NL)
> > VeryShortTerm(VST) - next coming weeks/month
> > ShortTerm(ST) - next few months
> > InterMediateTerm(IMT) - next 6 months, < a year
> > LT(LongTerm) - > year
> > VLT(VeryLongTerm) - > 2-5 years
> > â,¬uro(â,¬), noticed that your mailer also cannot handle the â,¬URO-font
> > SoftWare(SW)
> > OutlookExpress(OE)
> > OperatingSystem(OS)
> > MicroSoft(MS)
> > MetaStocK(MSK)
> > DownLoader(DL)
> >
> > NSv6.x no can do HTML? (too bad!).
> > OE is included in your OS (that is, if your not pionering with other
user
> > unfriendly or dreamer's sw).
> > If you run an old OS, you can download OE for free from the MS Update
Site.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ton Maas
> > ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> > Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
> >
> > ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
> > Van: "Daniel Martinez"
> > Aan: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Verzonden: zondag 22 oktober 2000 23:02
> > Onderwerp: Re: Advanced Get versus MetaStock
> >
> > A.J.:
> > I don't know what your T, IMT, ST, H, B initials mean. I assume these
mean:
> > H: height
> > B: bottom
> > T: Target
> > the rest I don't know.
> >
> > Netscape v4.75 cannot recreate the HTML created by Microsoft's Outlook
Express
> > 5.50.4133.2400. I can read your emails, but when I click "REPLY", all I
get is dozens of
> > little empty boxes.
> >
> > Daniel.
> >
> > "A.J. Maas" wrote:
> > --------snip-----------
>
>
|