|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Jean Paul :
Had the same problem and reported it to them
and problem was solved (according to my memory)
Theo L.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Duchesne" <maxpaul21@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 6:05 AM
Subject: Re: a beauty of a classic H&S
> Speaking of ordering some books on internet, anybody ordered some trading
> books to TradersLibrary recently and any problem with this Company to
> report?
> They took my money and I never received their books.
>
> Sincerely,
> Jean-Paul Duchesne
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Henry Abelman" <henry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 10:15 PM
> Subject: Re: a beauty of a classic H&S
>
>
> >
> > I just ordered both from the internet site buy.com
> > It was much much less expensive.
> >
> > I compated it to amazon.com and local book stores.
> > I think yo will save a lot of money at buy.com
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Lionel Issen <lissen@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 3:28 PM
> > Subject: Re: a beauty of a classic H&S
> >
> >
> > > There is a newer edition called "Technical Analysis of the Financial
> > > Markets", list price $70.00. There is also a Study Guide, list price
is
> > > 39.95. Both well worth the price.
> > > Lionel Issen
> > > lissen@xxxxxxxxx
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Al Taglavore" <altag@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 9:30 AM
> > > Subject: Re: a beauty of a classic H&S
> > >
> > >
> > > > Theo:
> > > >
> > > > >From page 119, fig 5.4a of "Technical Analysis of the Futures
Market"
> > by
> > > > John Murphy:
> > > > "A triple top. Similar to the head and shoulders except that all
> peaks
> > > are
> > > > at the same level. Each rally peak should be on lighter voulume.
The
> > > > pattern is complete when both troughs have been broken on heavier
> > volume.
> > > > The measuring techinque is the height of the pattern projected
> downward
> > > > from the breakdown point. Return moves back to the lower line are
not
> > > > unusual." Also, "Heavy upside volume on the completion of the
bottom
> is
> > > > also essential."
> > > >
> > > > In my observation, the reaction moves back to the lower break line
> > > > re-affirm the pattern and offer another opportunity to short with
> > > > conviction. It is this feature that distinguish the triple top from
> the
> > > > H&S.
> > > >
> > > > My chart of BRCM show that the highest close of 273 10/16 occurred
on
> > 8-24
> > > > with a vol of 6054800. The reaction low of 248 9/16 occurred on 8-29
> on
> > > vol
> > > > of 10521300. Thus, my response to your original post was that this
> > could
> > > > well be a triple top rather than a H&S.
> > > >
> > > > The only reason (hopefully valid) to have this discussion was to
> better
> > > > hone our TA and chart recognition abilities so that we can better
read
> > the
> > > > market and realize the most of the profit potential from various
> > patterns.
> > > > As you are aware, the money is made when one exits, not when when
one
> > > > enters.
> > > >
> > > > Al Taglavore
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----------
> > > > > From: T.E.M. Lockefeer <sky40912@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > Subject: Re: a beauty of a classic H&S
> > > > > Date: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 2:35 AM
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello Al,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Al Taglavore" <altag@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 5:28 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: a beauty of a classic H&S
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Does the volume requirements of a H&S apply to BRCM?
> > > > >
> > > > > Should not the volume
> > > > > > be much greater on the left shoulder, climaxing at the head and
> much
> > > > less
> > > > > > volume on the right shoulder?
> > > > >
> > > > > TL : Yes al volume conditions are as you described it.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Rather than H&S, could we not be seeing a
> > > > > > triple top?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > TL : What is the difference ? consequences ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > Theo Lockefeer.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Al Taglavore
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----------
> > > > > > From: T.E.M. Lockefeer <sky40912@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > Subject: a beauty of a classic H&S
> > > > > > Date: Friday, October 06, 2000 12:22 AM
> > > > > >
> > > > > > List :
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Look at BRCM chart and you will find (starting about July)
> > > > > > a Head and shoulder formation "out of the book" .
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Has anyone of you research about the % downsize of
> > > > > > H&S formations ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks and good weekend.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Theo Lockefeer.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
|