|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
This worked for me, Ton.
http://www.writing101.com/How2beConcise.html
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of A.J. Maas
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 5:40 PM
> To: Metastock-List
> Subject: Re: a beauty of a classic H&S
>
>
> 1) Yep, yours included. Great contribution, by the way.
>
> 2) Yep, since
> a-1) that going by personal opinions expressed in
> books+publications do not make me money.
> a-2) that it is my personal actions that do make me money.
> b-1) that from my personal actions made, I myself will gain,
> in money and in experience.
> b-2) that from b-1's both gains made in the past, I can rely
> on them both to gain more in future.
> c-1) that Hollywood movies are also creations from many
> published authors.
> c-2) that they make money for the movie directors, but not for me.
> d-1) that my personal practical experiencies do make me the
> desired cash+profits.
> d-2) that it is therefore also my money I have to put at risk
> and not that of the published authors.
> e-1) that the Risk of Welfare prohibits me to listen to
> non-factual & personal theories.
> e-2) that the Risk of Welfare requires me to go by my own
> personal experiences.
> f-1) that I'm on my own out there and when I need to
> decide.....................I'm on my own!
> f-2) that I have long ago outgrown the (school)
> books..............practise is a different ball game.
>
> Basicaly:
>
> No publishment is ever a definite rule set in such a dynamics
> that the financial markets are.
> Take what you can from them, the (school) books, for own use and
> then further go "your own way".
>
> The best example for this is that of the 400+ year old, eg the
> oldest known TA indicator :
> "Moving Averages".
>
> Its Up Crossings are Golden Crossings and its Down Crossings are
> Dead Crossings.
> Either direction can be invested.
>
> BUT, should one hang onto this first ever published personal
> theory, then every Up or
> every Down Crossing made will make you money in that right
> direction, Right?
>
> Wrong ! And that's known from practise {and history or vice versa}.
> In trending markets it will in 60-70% of the time help you to
> gain, but not in the other 30%,
> let alone in the market's trading phases.
>
> No need to publish this, since that they are well prooven facts.
> Anyone capable to read+write
> can understand these facts just by a quick look at the
> indicators, and thus the -in practise-
> not fool proof theory.
>
> And like mentioned before, many securities do not ever give
> volumes with their Charts, whilst
> valid H+S's are made on these Charts, and that can be easely
> taken positions in.
>
> Regards,
> Ton Maas
> ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
>
>
> ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
> Van: <Mullin285@xxxxxxx>
> Aan: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Verzonden: maandag 9 oktober 2000 15:22
> Onderwerp: Re: a beauty of a classic H&S
>
>
> >
> > > -----------------------------------------
> > > For starters
> > > -you should not believe everything that's written.
> >
> > Presumably this would include Email list rants and writings as well.
> >
> > > Second
> > > -personal experiences are more valuable.
> >
> > Does this suggest your personal experiences are more valuable
> than E&Ms as
> > well as Murphy and other published authors?
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
|