|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Another personal attack, another valid breach, twice (!!) again this week-end.
Writing programs, giving them away for free, and putting them up on a website
is one thing. As was mentioned, a referal to it then being available on
a website is sufficient.
Hastling it on the List and later the List with it, is another.
Both are continious breaches. As was mentioned too, clean up your web-act and
you would not have had to harrash the List with it.
This, unless you have some other means in doing so, which is basicaly irrelevant,
but then you have taken on the wrong List.
Now for the personal attacks.
Starting out by innocent replies to members first sending Charts as attachments and
later mails in the new HTML format, for some 12 months in a row now, anyone could
have written anything about me, my mailings, my publications, my systems, my indicators
and my who knows what, without having had received any structural obstructions from
me or from above. Literaly anything could and was said about me+them and were
mentioned to me here, and most too were then all valid List breaches. Quite a few
members have done so.
I have therefore -otoh- always, and in a mannor I have seem fit, all the time defended
myself and my publications and my systems and my indicators and my who knows what
publicaly, to these attacking and abusing List-members on the List. But, for too many,
all to no oveal. Therefore too, enough is enough.
Period.
Some List-members breaching and abusing and otherwise hastling and pestering
me, my publications or other List-mails send, have already been and will continiously
be reported -by me- to the List-owner for taking further necessary actions and/or consequences.
This I plan on doing untill the List is freed from the gluttering, abusing and otherwise
hastling members failing to comply to the hereabove and the herebelow.
This too, as it is not only whearing me out but also as it is deeply distracting the attention
away from the List's main focus (MSK+Equis'SW+Investing) and therefore it turning
the List into an ordinairy browling and into a commonly ordinairy mail and chat-box where
everything send, is being accepted. Directly the opposite too of that what is and was also
mentioned to new and old members on subscribtion -and recently twice now- in the later
List life: "the rule-set of List Policies set out by Equis Int.".
So if we do not receive anymore mails from you or others in the future, than that is too bad, but
note that you yourselves are responsable for your own mails and not others.
Period.
Regards,
Ton Maas
ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
Van: "Don LaBarre" <dllabarre@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Aan: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Verzonden: zondag 1 oktober 2000 15:39
Onderwerp: Re: Ton Maas Slander
> Because of all the slander I have receive from Ton Maas I will no longer be
> sending out my program. Which was a FREE program to help new Metastock
> users get up and running with real data. Some people on this list feel that
> if you aren't giving away formulas or trades then your not contributing to
> the list. There are many ways to help other Metastock users besides just
> giving help with formulas. It's just too bad that one or two people have to
> ruin it for the majority.
>
> I apologize to all the traders that would have liked to use my program.
> You're free to send Ton Maas a note expressing your feelings on this
> subject. I, along with many others, have given up!!
>
> Don LaBarre
> Web Developer
> Visual Basic Programmer
> www.u2ecom.com
> www.cedarcreektrading.com
> www.auto607.com
> www.conklinplayers.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Guy Tann"
> To: "Metastock User Group" <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 3:41 AM
> Subject: calculations
>
>
> > Don,
> >
> > Here's part of what I had in one indicator that I called COMHX01X09.
> >
> > COMHX03:= ( FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") - Ref(
> > FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") , -3 )) / 3;
> >
> > COMHX04:= ( FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") - Ref(
> > FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") , -4 )) / 4;
> >
> > COMHX05:= ( FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") - Ref(
> > FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") , -5 )) / 5;
> >
> > COMHX06:= ( FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") - Ref(
> > FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") , -6 ) ) / 6;
> >
> > COMHX07:= ( FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") - Ref(
> > FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") , -7 ) ) / 7;
> >
> > COMHX08:= ( FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") - Ref(
> > FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") , -8 ) ) / 8;
> >
> > COMHX09:= ( FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") - Ref(
> > FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") , -9 ) ) / 9;
> > COMHX09;
> >
> > The only thing missing is COMHX01 and COMHX02. When running, it works
> > sporadically or not at all. I cut and pasted COMHX01 and COMHX02 into
> their
> > own indicators (which is how I tested them in the first place) and they
> work
> > fine. I'm now moving all of these back into individual indicators. I
> have
> > no idea why this didn't work since I only had 9 variables. The COMX09;
> > entry was strictly for plotting purposes so I could check out the detailed
> > results (remember, I'm doing a conversion here and need to verify
> > calculations to 4 decimal places).
> >
> > After verifying my calculation results, I delete the final COMHX09
> plotting
> > entry. Anyway, why they don't work when contained in one indicator and do
> > work when cut and pasted into their own indicator, I have absolutely no
> > idea.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Guy
> >
> > " If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you."
> >
> >
> >
>
|