|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
> The only thing missing is COMHX01 and COMHX02. When running, it works
> sporadically or not at all. I cut and pasted COMHX01 and COMHX02 into their
> own indicators (which is how I tested them in the first place) and they work
> fine.
Seems that there is a lot missing, for it to work ok.
The Vars
No doubt transponing the Vars 1 and 2 into separate indicators will work, since
that the orginal Vars 3 to 9 printed below do not contain any errors.
Thus no doubt that the Vars 1 to 9 are correct. However now for the Indicator............
The Indicator
The expression that makes up the Indicator, is only calling the Var 9.
As such, will also be the only Var that makes up the Indicator-base for the calculation
formula of the COMHX01X09 Indicator.
And thus will be the only Var that is set out to do the Indicator's calculation work.
This expression will thus be the only Var in the Indicator that is calculated, and not the
any of the other 8 Vars, since that Var 9 is the only VAR that's being adressed {called},
and that therefore makes up the COMHX01X09 Indicator.
Remains that the other 8 Vars are thus useless {superflouis} put here and are thus
unnessecary added lines in the Indicator. They are NOT part of NOR do they make
up the COMHX01X09 indicator.
Thus unless you include them each by their own indicator-reference calls, then in your
instance, the Var 9 "is also" the COMHX01X09 indicator.
And like mentioned before in a prev mail, the " ; " separator is also put here only distracting
the program, eg since that another reference call {expression} is expected {but not present}.
Regards,
Ton Maas
ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
Van: "Guy Tann" <grt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Aan: "Metastock User Group" <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Verzonden: zondag 1 oktober 2000 8:41
Onderwerp: calculations
> Don,
>
> Here's part of what I had in one indicator that I called COMHX01X09.
>
> COMHX03:= ( FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") - Ref(
> FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") , -3 )) / 3;
>
> COMHX04:= ( FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") - Ref(
> FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") , -4 )) / 4;
>
> COMHX05:= ( FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") - Ref(
> FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") , -5 )) / 5;
>
> COMHX06:= ( FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") - Ref(
> FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") , -6 ) ) / 6;
>
> COMHX07:= ( FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") - Ref(
> FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") , -7 ) ) / 7;
>
> COMHX08:= ( FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") - Ref(
> FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") , -8 ) ) / 8;
>
> COMHX09:= ( FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") - Ref(
> FmlVar("COMH-MXX","COMHMXX") , -9 ) ) / 9;
> COMHX09;
>
> The only thing missing is COMHX01 and COMHX02. When running, it works
> sporadically or not at all. I cut and pasted COMHX01 and COMHX02 into their
> own indicators (which is how I tested them in the first place) and they work
> fine. I'm now moving all of these back into individual indicators. I have
> no idea why this didn't work since I only had 9 variables. The COMX09;
> entry was strictly for plotting purposes so I could check out the detailed
> results (remember, I'm doing a conversion here and need to verify
> calculations to 4 decimal places).
>
> After verifying my calculation results, I delete the final COMHX09 plotting
> entry. Anyway, why they don't work when contained in one indicator and do
> work when cut and pasted into their own indicator, I have absolutely no
> idea.
>
> Regards,
>
> Guy
>
> " If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you."
>
>
>
|