|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Ignore
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of A.J. Maas
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 5:56 PM
> To: Metastock-List
> Subject: Re: More indicator questions??? Help!
>
>
> For a programmer/webdev/webmaster you seem to have lost it.
> Multiple websites
> {and commercial too, I suppose} and no brain. Why don't you all
> start building your
> own instead of pestering others for
> it...............................and then post their results?
>
> First the cheeck + then the nerve, then:
>
> Do you truely think that somebody is giving away Propriety
> stuff................?
> Let alone shared propriety?
>
> Don't you read your List mails? You have been around long enough
> to do so and
> to follow one's posts on this topic !!!!
>
> And do we need your companies {commercial} sollicitations here:
> www.xxx.com, www.this.com and www.that.com ??
>
> Regards,
> Ton Maas
> ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
>
>
> ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
> Van: "Don LaBarre" <dllabarre@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Aan: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Verzonden: donderdag 28 september 2000 21:49
> Onderwerp: Re: More indicator questions??? Help!
>
>
> > Guy
> >
> > Just for the fun of it, would you send me a copy of the
> indicator that is
> > hanging your system?
> > Just cut and paste it into an email if you want.
> > Also a brief write up on what the outcome is that you expect.
> >
> > Don LaBarre
> > Web Developer
> > Visual Basic Programmer
> > www.u2ecom.com
> > www.cedarcreektrading.com
> > www.auto607.com
> > www.conklinplayers.com
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Guy Tann" <grt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "Metastock User Group" <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 12:28 AM
> > Subject: More indicator questions??? Help!
> >
> >
> > > List,
> > >
> > > Well, I'm still playing with MS and trying to convert some of these
> > > indicators. This has gotten to be one of my longest conversions ever.
> > >
> > > To bring everyone and anyone up to date, I resolved my
> problem with MS'
> > > basic calculations by putting in my own code to handle simple
> addition and
> > > subtraction. Next, I ordered and installed v7.02 and didn't see any
> > > problems. I also was able to validate the calculations using
> Ref() and
> > they
> > > all work. I decided, at that point, that since I had used individual
> > > indicators for each one of my Ref() calculations, that I
> would probably
> > > benefit from combining them into 2 indicators. I copied the 18 Ref()
> > > variables into 2 indicators (I don't want to push it too much, so I
> > limited
> > > myself to 9 variables per indicator).
> > >
> > > I then checked out each variable again, validating them
> individually and
> > > they all work correctly. So far, so good!
> > >
> > > Now I'm trying to add the next bunch of variables in three different
> > > indicators. MS hangs completely and I have to End Task to
> shut it down.
> > I
> > > thought I might have made a mistake in one of my new variables, so I
> > copied
> > > them into Note Pad and deleted them all from MS.
> > >
> > > OK, for now, here's where we stand. First I rebooted the
> system to insure
> > > everything was fresh and clean. Next, I added a very simple
> variable to
> > one
> > > of my Ref() indicators.
> > >
> > > Indicator X01X09 contains 9 Ref() variables. They work! Next I add a
> > very
> > > simple variable to the indicator. Before adding this variable, X01X09
> > > contained 9 variables (which should be substantially less than MS' 20
> > > variable limit for one indicator). The system hangs completely again.
> > This
> > > variable looks like:
> > > CDL:= X01 + X02 + X03 + X04 + X05 + X06;
> > > CDL;
> > >
> > > Now this variable is in the same indicator as X01 through X06
> (but I have
> > > tried it in an indicator on it's own referencing those
> detailed variables
> > in
> > > X01X09) so no indirect referencing should be necessary.
> > >
> > > I am at a total loss. MS hangs completely. If I go back and
> bracket this
> > > last variable out, MS still hangs. If I delete the code from the
> > indicator
> > > and reboot the system it starts to work again, until I add my next
> > > indicator. I've tried adding a different indicator and that
> dies as well.
> > > I went so far as to add a simple variable like CDL:= X01;
> > > CDL;
> > >
> > > And that didn't work either. If I didn't know better (or
> maybe I don't) I
> > > would assume I've reached MS' variable limit.
> > >
> > > I understand the MS 20 variable limit per indicator and MS'
> limit of 1,000
> > > indicators and I am nowhere near either of these. Are there other
> > internal
> > > limits that I don't know about? Is there an internal timeout
> within MS
> > and
> > > if my calculations take too long, MS assumes that the system died and
> > shuts
> > > itself down? Does MS do anything internally with my
> indicators that could
> > > affect the variable count or indicator count. The last 18
> variables use
> > the
> > > Ref() function.
> > > Tomorrow, I'm going to try deleting these Ref() variables and
> then try to
> > > add the one that's been failing. Again, even with 40 years experience
> > > programming, I'm having problems that shouldn't hamper a neophyte. :)
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Guy
> > >
> > > " If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you."
> > >
> >
>
>
>
|