[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Data Window



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Tahoma size=2>I presume you are using metastock. Here you 
go.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Tahoma size=2>open a chart.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Tahoma size=2>rigt click and select the "inner window" -  
"properties" option</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Tahoma size=2>enable the "show values in title ba"r 
option</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Tahoma size=2>your done. as easy as that.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Tahoma size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Tahoma size=2>Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 09:05:13 -0700<BR>From: "Ed 
Montero" &lt;<A 
href="mailto:emontero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>emontero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>&gt;<BR>Subject: 
Data Window question<BR><BR>This is a multi-part message in MIME 
format.<BR><BR>- ------=_NextPart_000_003D_01BF9A27.0F399FE0<BR>Content-Type: 
text/plain;<BR>charset="iso-8859-1"<BR>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 
quoted-printable<BR><BR>Sorry if this is a stupid question, but....<BR><BR>Is 
there a way to have the data window display only the current bar's =<BR>data 
without having to either put your cursor over the bar, or drag the =<BR>cursor 
to the current bar every time it changes?<BR><BR>I just simply want to see the 
current bar's O, H, L, C and indicator =<BR>values at all times, it doesn't have 
to be in a data window...<BR><BR>Thanks<BR>Ed Montero<BR><A 
href="mailto:emontero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>emontero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A><BR><BR></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Fri Mar 31 09:13:48 2000
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
	by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA06500
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 03:18:18 -0800
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id DAA16404
	for metastock-outgoing; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 03:37:21 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA16401
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 03:37:18 -0700
Received: from out3.mx.nwbl.wi.voyager.net (sendmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [169.207.3.79])
	by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA21845
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 03:47:57 -0700 (MST)
Received: from cb40711a (jaresh-1-163.mdm.mdx.execpc.com [169.207.194.37])
	by out3.mx.nwbl.wi.voyager.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id EAA12860
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 04:31:51 -0600
Message-ID: <002d01bf9afc$5e5184a0$c2d40a18@xxxxxxxx>
From: "Craig Monroe" <cmonroe@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20000331054219.26222.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Brown and Co.
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 04:30:52 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0029_01BF9AC9.E5964DC0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:   

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2722.1300" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face="Times New Roman" size=4>By in large, this has 
been my experience with Brown as well. A downside is that they often do not have 
a supply of more thinly traded stocks available for borrowing to allow shorting 
these. My experience with confirmations is that they are quick in the larger 
stocks but sometimes agonizingly slow on smaller issues. </FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE 
style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV 
  style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> 
  CMA </DIV>
  <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A 
  href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"; 
  title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, March 30, 2000 11:42 
  PM</DIV>
  <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Brown and Co.</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>Tim: <BR>&nbsp;Your post was most enlightening. What does Brown 
  chage on limit orders and how<BR>are your fills on NASDAQ limit 
  orders?<BR>&nbsp; What has your back office experience been on getting Brown 
  to correct its own<BR>errors. I have long been tempted to open an account at 
  Brown, but have always<BR>held off because of the torrent of negative comments 
  on the net about Brown's<BR>supposedly arrogant and hostile attitude towards 
  customers. <BR>&nbsp; So your input on these issues would greatly be 
  appreciated.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
  CMA<BR><BR><BR>From: "Tim Lumley" &lt;<A 
  href="mailto:tlmly@xxxxxxxx";>tlmly@xxxxxxxx</A>&gt;<BR>Subject: RE: Brokerage 
  alternatives<BR><BR>I have used Brown for a couple of years now and they are 
  my favorite of the<BR>6 or 7 I've used for various accounts.&nbsp; Good 
  executions and very quick<BR>confirmations.&nbsp; I often will see my order go 
  off on the Time &amp; Sales<BR>streamer and the confirmation will be there as 
  soon as I can get to the<BR>Brown web site.<BR><BR>I have heard gripes about 
  service before, but I don't recall any problems.<BR>Had there been any, they 
  would have made up for them today when the GP<BR>specialist tried to mess with 
  me.&nbsp; I had a 3,000 share limit sell order on<BR>GP at Brown for 39 
  1/4.&nbsp; I saw the first print @39 1/4 was for 1,000 shares<BR>and it was 
  immediately followed by several large trades around 39 3/4.<BR>Within about 90 
  seconds, the stock then quickly settled back to 39 1/4 and I<BR>got a 
  confirmation of all 3,000 shares filling @ 39 1/4.&nbsp; I called Brown 
  and<BR>told them what had happened and said the 39 3/4&nbsp; trades should not 
  have gone<BR>off before mine.&nbsp; To make a long story short, they went back 
  to the<BR>specialist and got 2,000 of the 3,000 shares adjusted to 39 3/4 
  netting me<BR>an extra $1,000.&nbsp; Don't know if other brokers I've used 
  would have done the<BR>same thing, but the Brown rep could not have been more 
  helpful.<BR><BR>TGL<BR><BR><BR><BR>__________________________________________________<BR>Do 
  You Yahoo!?<BR>Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.<BR><A 
  href="http://im.yahoo.com";>http://im.yahoo.com</A><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Fri Mar 31 09:14:54 2000
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
	by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA15625
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 06:46:22 -0800
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id GAA17021
	for metastock-outgoing; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 06:58:27 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA17014
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 06:58:23 -0700
Received: from mail.rdc1.tn.home.com (imail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [24.2.7.66])
	by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA21961
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 07:09:03 -0700 (MST)
Received: from CI38853A ([24.18.242.168]) by mail.rdc1.tn.home.com
          (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with SMTP
          id <20000331135308.REWQ14777.mail.rdc1.tn.home.com@xxxxxxxx>
          for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 05:53:08 -0800
From: "Tim Lumley" <tlmly@xxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Brown and Co.
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 07:53:02 -0600
Message-ID: <NDBBKIFGALICOGOCCOOJIENHCBAA.tlmly@xxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
In-Reply-To: <20000331054219.26222.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Importance: Normal
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:   

Brown charges $5 on market orders and $10 on limit orders.  They also have
pretty good commission rates on options, although they are not the lowest.
Their margin rates are about as low as you will find though.  Not sure how
to respond to your question on NASDAQ limit fills.  Most of the stocks I
trade are listed stocks, or some of the larger cap NASDAQ.  I often try to
cherry-pick with limit orders at (or even below) the bid.  Sometimes I get
them, sometimes I don't.  If I don't I'll just wait for another opportunity
to get my price.  Although I don't have any data to back it up, it is my
impression that I am more likely to get filled on those types of orders at
Brown rather than American Express or TD Waterhouse where I have other
accounts.

With regards to their back office, it has just not been an issue with me.  I
vaguely remember having to make a couple of calls in the past but don't
recall any significant problems.  They have called me though, either to
notify me of option assignments or to tell me of errors that I made.  I
think the comments you hear about a "supposedly arrogant and hostile
attitude to customers" may be related to their Boston location.  As a
transplanted Southerner who had to live in the Northeast for 15 years, I can
verify there is a different culture up there.  I guess maybe I got used to
it somewhat, but I don't recall anything to out of the ordinary in my
dealings with them.

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of CMA
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 11:42 PM
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Brown and Co.

 Tim:
 Your post was most enlightening. What does Brown chage on limit orders and
how
are your fills on NASDAQ limit orders?
  What has your back office experience been on getting Brown to correct its
own
errors. I have long been tempted to open an account at Brown, but have
always
held off because of the torrent of negative comments on the net about
Brown's
supposedly arrogant and hostile attitude towards customers.
  So your input on these issues would greatly be appreciated.
                 CMA


From: "Tim Lumley" <tlmly@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Brokerage alternatives

I have used Brown for a couple of years now and they are my favorite of the
6 or 7 I've used for various accounts.  Good executions and very quick
confirmations.  I often will see my order go off on the Time & Sales
streamer and the confirmation will be there as soon as I can get to the
Brown web site.

I have heard gripes about service before, but I don't recall any problems.
Had there been any, they would have made up for them today when the GP
specialist tried to mess with me.  I had a 3,000 share limit sell order on
GP at Brown for 39 1/4.  I saw the first print @39 1/4 was for 1,000 shares
and it was immediately followed by several large trades around 39 3/4.
Within about 90 seconds, the stock then quickly settled back to 39 1/4 and I
got a confirmation of all 3,000 shares filling @ 39 1/4.  I called Brown and
told them what had happened and said the 39 3/4  trades should not have gone
off before mine.  To make a long story short, they went back to the
specialist and got 2,000 of the 3,000 shares adjusted to 39 3/4 netting me
an extra $1,000.  Don't know if other brokers I've used would have done the
same thing, but the Brown rep could not have been more helpful.

TGL



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com