|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Regards,
Ton Maas
ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
----- Original Message -----
From: <formulas@xxxxxxxxx>
To: A.J. Maas
Sent: maandag 3 april 2000 16:51
Subject: RE: CCI [FOR2000031900000041]
> To enable us to provide more efficient support, use the "Reply" feature in your email program when responding to this email.
Please send unrelated issues in a new email.
>
> Your email was responded to by:
> William
> Equis Customer Support
> http://www.equis.com
>
>
> William's response is below the following line.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> When we publish our MetaStock manual, we include the calculation methods
> for all the indicators we can. Some are not included, either because of
> the complexity of the formula or because of legal restrictions.
>
> I would love to help you out here, but I do not have the formula. It is
> part of our program, but that was written in C++, not our formula
> language. Additionally, company policy forbids distributing any part of
> our programs source code.
>
> All I can do is refer you to the October 1980 issue of Futures magazine.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> Have attached the various available CCI versions.
>
> A quick look will let the viewer believe that all are 'one and the
> same'.
> A closer look tho, wil show the differences (in patterns + in values).
>
> The "CCI-Standard" and the "CCI-Standard-custom" differ indeed, but
> 'only' in values, not in the pattern. Its the closest to, so to speak,
> that is
> available at the moment.
>
> A mail to formulas@xxxxxxxxx requesting Equis to provide you+List with
> the code for the CCI-Standard formula, might be of help here
> (have cc-ed with this mail).
>
> Regards,
> Ton Maas
> ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "M. Robb"
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: zondag 19 maart 2000 11:51
> Subject: Re: CCI
>
>
> > Ton Mass:
> >
> > Plotting this latest CCI from you yields values, for one example of an
> S&P
> > 500, over a range of + 275 to -425, compared to the MS CCI standard of
> a
> > much tighter range of + 175 to - 150 approximately.
> >
> > In addition to having a wider range, this last formula traces a
> somewhat
> > differrent shape, in that it appears slightly more smooth, yet less
> > sensitive at tops...than the MS CCI standard.
> >
> > ((MP()-Mov(MP(),14,S))/
> > (1.5*Stdev(Abs(Mov( MP()-Mov(MP() ,14,S),14,S)),14)))*100
> >
> > Please understand that I am not trying in any way to correct you. I am
> > merely copying the formulas as you send them into my MS 6.51 EOD and
> viewing
> > the plots.
> >
> > Mike Robb
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "A.J. Maas"
> > To: "Metastock-List" <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2000 9:54 AM
> > Subject: Re: CCI
> >
> >
> > > The appearance of the MSK's "CCI-Standard" and "CCI-Equis"
> indicators
> > > differs full stop. My mail's CCI indicator is close to the
> CCI-standard. And
> > > to top it off, the Achelis' TA from A to Z weblink version also
> "totaly differs".
> > >
> > > Also note that in the CCI formula that I had send, a "large typo"
> might
--------------snip----------------------
>
> "MetaStock, Equis, OptionScope, and QuoteCenter are registered trademarks of Equis International. Achelis Binary Wave, The
DownLoader, Expert Advisor, The Explorer, Visual Control, and Smart Charts are trademarks of Equis International."
>
>
|