|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Ton:
You are correct. The law and the constitution means whatever a judge decides
they means. This was attributed to Oliver Wendell Holmes, a chief judge of
the Supreme Court.
What is an MOJ?
Incidentally, over the years several companies have successfully sued
Microsoft for just this kind of abusive behavior. There was the Stacker
Electronics case which cost Microsoft $250 megs plus their legal costs. They
probably could have bought Stacker for about $15 to $20 megs.
Lionel Issen
lissen@xxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: A.J. Maas <anthmaas@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2000 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: Question....
There is always still this minor Software courtcase going on, eg about a
software
being legaly yours.
Microsoft is always willing to explain how unjustified the US legal system
is in regards to Copyright, TradeMarks, All Rights Reserved etc. when
a MOJ, bunch of State reps or a Judge's ruling is later telling you
differently,
eg to forget about the ownership+rights that come with it :
"Nice that you are the owner, developer, creator and its originator
and that you also hold all of the above legal copy/traderights, but
that you legaly(since this over-ruling) also have no rights at all to
and do with "underlay" as you seem fit".
Excerpts derived from the forthcoming "Microsoft vs the X US monopolysts
States"
court ruling on their software(Internet Explorer) being rightiously(on users
requests)
and legaly(its their property, so they are free to do whatever they want to
do with it)
integrated into their own(=legit) OS(Win9x) software.
Go figure !!!!!!!
Regards,
Ton Maas
ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Hefner" <vonhef@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: maandag 3 april 2000 5:35
Subject: Question....
Any legal minds here? I have been learning a trading method, and have since
developed an
"Expert Advisor" and MetaStock code to go along with it. My question deals
with sharing this
Code with others... for example here is a statement from there web page:
Any formulae presented are copyrighted. .... Copyright © 1996,
1997, 1998, 1999 Charles Drummond
"Drummond Geometry", "PL", "P&L", "Point and Line" copyright by Charles
Drummond. All rights reserved.
I did learn a method developed by Drummond, but all of my code is my own
work, so my question is:
What are my limitations in sharing my MetaStock work? I have no intentions
of selling this, nor actively
teaching others how to use it.... but I don't mind sharing the MetaStock
code (If it wont get me into trouble).
Thanks,
Adam Hefner
|