|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Dear tvk2,
<br>My, my, my, aren't we getting a bit above ourselves here: "...should
be teaching school--- not using the internet". My wife surfs the internet
- competently, and does a superb job as a teacher. I do agree with you
however that "there is too much garbage hitting the airways". Now let me
quickly delete your message and this reply before my wife reads them, and
gives you a piece of <b>her</b> mind.
<br>Jan Willem Roberts
<br>
<p>tvk2@xxxxxxxx wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>We are all receiving too many messages because most
of the responders
<br>don't have brains enough to choose "reply to sender Only"--- so, there
is
<br>too much garbage hitting the airways, Some of these folks should
be
<br>teaching school--- not using the internet, T.C.V.K.</blockquote>
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>
<br>On Mon, 3 Apr 2000 16:54:21 +0200 "Moshe Shalom"
<br><moshe_shalom@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
<br>>Hi All,
<br>>
<br>>Is it only me or everybody receives twice the postings to the list?
<br>>Please
<br>>advise.
<br>>
<br>>Moshe Shalom
<br>>Israel</blockquote>
</html>
</x-html>From ???@??? Wed Apr 05 07:25:12 2000
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA28976
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 12:04:40 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA12599
for metastock-outgoing; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 12:08:38 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA12595
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 12:08:34 -0600
Received: from inbound.satyam.net.in ([202.144.76.6])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA26022
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 12:19:24 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from default (210.214.43.32) by inbound.satyam.net.in (NPlex 4.5.049)
id 38E4ECF80006FC99 for metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 18:00:53 +0000
Message-ID: <000201bf9e60$4d9dcee0$202bd6d2@xxxxxxx>
From: "Dr. R.BHANJA" <bhanjar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Metastock Software Developer Kit
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 23:22:47 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
There are two versions of the Software Developerkit (SDK) for Metastock. One
is READ only and another is READ/WRITE. I had been to the equis iste to know
the difference. But I could not able to differentiate them. As the name
suggests the READ only SDK will not be able to write. If that is so then one
cannot direct the output to any file while testing with Metsastock. Would
anybody send some samples of this SDK with its real job.
Bhanja
-----Original Message-----
From: Allan Havemose <havemose@xxxxxxxxx>
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, April 03, 2000 9:14 PM
Subject: Re: Metastock Software Developer Kit
>I have it. It's well documented, comes with source code and build
>examples for several environments. I've only used it with VC++, but
>have not had any problems. I don't think you can get at the internals
>in the system tester.
>
>Allan
>
>--- "Dr. R.BHANJA" <bhanjar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I am a new member in this group. I am using Metastock 6.52. Currently
>> Equis has introduced a "Software Developer Kit" for Metastock 7.0. I
>> am considering to purchase the Software Developer kit and upgrade
>> Metastock 6.52 to 7.0 (End of day data). Has any body in the group
>> used "Software Developer kit"? I would like to know is it worth
>> buying it. Metstock's system tester part is a bottleneck for me as it
>> is not able to handle codes of more than 945 charcaters. Further, I
>> want to use the "results" part of the system report for any
>> statistical calculation as the drawdowns figures and other result
>> figures are detailed there. So can the "Software developer Kit" help
>> me to get rid of this problem?
>> BHANJA
>>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
>http://im.yahoo.com
|