|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>List,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Although NASDAQ -in my systems opinion- still not
has</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>seen it lows, <FONT color=#008080
size=3><STRONG><EM>(i mailed yesterday)</EM></STRONG></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>Looks like the system is ok ;)
,</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>Now : for today (13/4) : an
almost first rated buy signal !</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>Still think that lower is
possible after today.</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>Considering what the NASDAQ did
yesterday (about -7%)</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>we surely had an outperformer
:) (-2%).</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>Seriously :
</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>Stoploss stays at $14.50 and
H-5.</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<HR>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>QTRN : (12/04/2000) $
15.19</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>HOLD-5 is the situation. (Buy still possible but
don't</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>wait another week ok ?).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>SL : $14.50 </FONT></DIV>
<DIV>
<HR>
</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>Comments :
Welcome.</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>Anyone joined the club
?</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>Theo
Lockefeer</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Thu Apr 13 14:44:41 2000
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA09615
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:21:01 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA10897
for metastock-outgoing; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:35:06 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA10894
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:35:03 -0600
Received: from smtp02.wxs.nl (smtp02.wxs.nl [195.121.6.60])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA04657
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:46:53 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from escom ([195.121.222.211]) by smtp02.wxs.nl
(Netscape Messaging Server 3.61) with SMTP id AAA4707
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 07:16:48 +0200
Message-ID: <002501bfa507$e7d4cba0$d3de79c3@xxxxx>
From: "A.J. Maas" <anthmaas@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <38E4C81E.4021E131@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Eat thy words : Mark Mobius & Abbey Cohen
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 07:19:22 +0200
Organization: Ms-IRB
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.3825.400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.3825.400
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
Since the WAXdaq lost its shine.......................
According to the RSI, the WAXdaq level to expect a Turnaround(=major support)
to take place = its former breakout 2923.
Your counts are always welcomed, tho.
Regards,
Ton Maas
ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rajesh" <rajesh@xxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: vrijdag 31 maart 2000 17:45
Subject: Eat thy words : Mark Mobius & Abbey Cohen
> Re : Nasdaq
> I'm willing to take them (Mark Mobius & Abbey Cohen) head on. I don't
> at all think that the Nasdaq is going to crash. If you see the chart,
> you
> can clearly see that this is a devastating c-wave of an
> a-b-c correction. Mark & Abbey have done the perfect tango with Elliot
> in
> reading the unfolding of the c-wave in advance.
> Looking at the chart you can see
> 1. the a-wave from the market top
> 2. the b-wave (in clear 3-waves) going to make a possible double top
> 3. the c-wave downwards which has unfolded
>
> This c-wave will be in 5-impulsive waves downward but the daily chart
> shows no breaking-up of the c-wave, hence it is a monowave and in
> order to see the internal structure of this c-wave you will have to look
>
> at
> the hourly charts.
>
> Coming back to the Nasdaq chart
> 1. You will notice the a-b-c formation made by the market during
> January/February 2000 after a sustained rise from mid-October 1999. In
> this
> a-b-c flat formation, the b-wave crossed the market top and the c-wave
> failed to go below the bottom of wave-a. Hence, the formation was an
> irregular failure. This was the first sign of strength in the market.
> The
> subsequent rise to the market high of
> 5000+ fell far short of the expected rise that should follow an
> irregular
> failure pattern. The only conclusion one can draw is that the rise was
> corrective in nature, qualifying it as either a larger degree B-wave or
> an
> X-wave.
> 2. In all probability it was an X-wave leading me to believe that the
> a-b-c formation (we are in the c-wave of this formation) after the
> market
> high of 5000+ is only part of a corrective combination which
> by itself is suggesting tremendous strength in the market.
>
> In my opinion, the market may not even fall into the price zone of
> the first a-b-c which is approx 4250. Even if this level is broken,
> the market will never go below the c-wave of the first a-b-c which is
> approx 3750.
>
> If these readings of mine are correct, then when the fall is over, the
> Nasdaq composite would commence it's most phenomenol bull run in
> it's history.
>
> Ciao
>
>
|