|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>Herman
:</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>Interesting again
:).</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>> Using VectorVest ( <A
href="http://www.vectorvest.com/";>http://www.vectorvest.com/</A> ) it is quite
easy to perform<BR>> analysis that include fundamental data, something that
is missing in MS. VV<BR>> has some 30 columns of fundamental data that can be
screened in seconds for<BR>> approx. 7000+ US/CAN stocks. Quite efficient
actually.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>Actually i am an ex-vectorvest
user ( a year ago).</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>My opinion about Vectorvest
: probably their fundamental</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>data is quiet good (nice to know
in these (ex ?) crazy internet</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080
face=Arial><STRONG><EM>times.</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>Their customer service is
ok.</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><EM><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial>But i found in their
RT-timer (technical tool as you probably know)</FONT></EM></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>a major fault : The timing
can be much beter and how is now</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>the basis of my private system
which has formidable backtesting</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>results : now is my next problem
(;)) to actually make it really work</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>in this difficult NASDAQ market
: f.i. i found that on 13th (!) of march</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>(no not a friday but on a
monday) the bears started their thing.</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>If you would like to email me
about vectorvest and metastock</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>as a usefull combination or
related topics : <A
href="mailto:sky40912@xxxxxxxxx";>sky40912@xxxxxxxxx</A></EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>is my
email-address.</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>(BTW i am Dutch , your name
looks european ?).</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>> If you are interested I can email you the full
29 column worksheet<BR>> privately if you like. I am sure some tinkering
would reveal other price<BR>> related trends.<BR>> <BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>If it isnot too big : please
do.</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>As we probable get off topic :
please email me privately.</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>Succesfull !
trading.</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>Theo
Lockefeer.</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> -----
Original Message ----- <BR>> From: Herman van den Bergen <<<A
href="mailto:psytek@xxxxxxxx";>mailto:psytek@xxxxxxxx</A>><A
href="mailto:psytek@xxxxxxxx";>psytek@xxxxxxxx</A>><BR>> To: <<<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>>
Sent: April 13, 2000 2:51 AM<BR>> Subject: Performance vs Price<BR>>
<BR>> > Hi,<BR>> > <BR>> > I am a newbie and invite your
comments on the idea that buying stocks in<BR>> > certain price ranges
might give one a little extra edge. See Excell chart<BR>> >
attached.<BR>> > <BR>> > Has anybody used this relationship to their
advantage?<BR>> > <BR>> > Happy trading,<BR>> >
Herman.<BR>> > <BR>> <<<<<BR>> <BR>> <BR>>
</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Fri Apr 14 10:11:46 2000
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA23560
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:07:46 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA27078
for metastock-outgoing; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:07:57 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA27073
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:07:53 -0600
Received: from mail1.rdc3.on.home.com (mail1.rdc3.on.home.com [24.2.9.40])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA05515
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:19:52 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from cr949716-a ([24.112.187.154]) by mail1.rdc3.on.home.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.02.00 201-229-116) with SMTP
id <20000414160340.FBOE11061.mail1.rdc3.on.home.com@xxxxxxxxxx>
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 09:03:40 -0700
Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.20000414120337.00985e00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Sender: psytek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32)
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 12:03:37 -0400
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Herman van den Bergen <psytek@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Performance vs Price
In-Reply-To: <011b01bfa5a0$e9291f80$66d879c3@xxxxx>
References: <3.0.1.32.20000412205117.00967d10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
Thanks, your comments are greatly appreciated!
At 11:48 PM 04/13/2000 +0200, you wrote:
>According to your setup, the 40-50 range priced stocks are/were also the most
>advancing stocks, that scored 100%.
Absolutely right, I should have used a forward approach instead of backwards.
>But to give these results, which were well done by the way, some greater
and more
>in general, technical value, then:
>
>1. - 52 wks in a stock's life time seems a little too short, eg as though
> a "baby has just been born".
>2. - test results are generated from an ultimate volatile market's period,
> eg tested in a market's periodic utterly full trending phase.
True, but I am looking for relative short term factors and might even
reduce the time span more in an effort to find composites that best lead
and respond to various market segments. I believe that the more recent the
data the more value it has for short term trading. I use FAs and long term
price history mostly to assess stock volatility (risk) and overall trend.
My approach might be naive but at this stage of the game simple indicators
and stats are easier to grasp intuitively than complex combinations of wild
formulas - I like to preserve an intuitive appreciation and feel for
whatever method I use.
>What are/would have been the results if markets weren't that very trending
/ volatile?
The future will tell, but doesn't this applies to all analysis?
>Like your results (and given about the same time interval for measured
period), then a
>question remains : "how seriously should we take all this?".
Just a very small, but well defined, factor in the overall formula. Give me
twenty more of those and I would expect to be doing pretty well :-)
>A job well done,
Thank you - for a beginner words of praise mean much :-)
Happy trading,
Herman.
|