|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#800000>Same problem here in Milwaukee, WI USA.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#800000>I always download a couple hours after the
markets close, but fell down on the job yesterday. Sure wish I would
have.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#800000>Thanks,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#800000>Bill N.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A href="mailto:sky40912@xxxxxxxxx"; title=sky40912@xxxxxxxxx>Theo E.M.
Lockefeer</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, April 15, 2000 09:27
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Reuters Datalink
problem</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>Same problem here in Belgium
Yngvi</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>Thx for
reporting.</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#008080 face=Arial><STRONG><EM>Theo
Lockefeer</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>----- Original Message ----- </FONT>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>From: Yngvi Hardarson <<A
href="mailto:hardy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>hardy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>To: Metastock list (E-mail) <<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Sent: April 15, 2000 4:10 PM</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Subject: Reuters Datalink
problem</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>> <BR>> Having a problem
downloading from Reuters Datalink this morning (April 15).<BR>> The
download seems to "hang". Anybody else having a problem?<BR>> <BR>>
Regards,<BR>> Yngvi<BR>> <A
href="mailto:hardy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>hardy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A><BR>> <BR>>
</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Apr 15 17:21:09 2000
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA05359
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 09:49:04 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA09740
for metastock-outgoing; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 10:20:25 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA09735
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 10:20:21 -0600
Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA06458
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 10:32:24 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from 209-122-247-77.s77.tnt8.lnhva.md.dialup.rcn.com ([209.122.247.77] helo=erols.com)
by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #3)
id 12gVEI-0004qf-00
for metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 12:15:31 -0400
Message-ID: <38F895D0.1D96A819@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 12:16:16 -0400
From: scheier <scheier@xxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Eat thy words : Mark Mobius & Abbey Cohen
References: <38E4C81E.4021E131@xxxxxxxx> <002501bfa507$e7d4cba0$d3de79c3@xxxxx> <001b01bfa593$d3567f20$9857a018@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <02b101bfa5b0$fe2dba20$66d879c3@xxxxx> <38F728F4.92B95747@xxxxxxxxx> <003001bfa6df$c56f8080$0fd879c3@xxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
Most of us all know how RSI works and how to compare it to price for
divergence. But to suggest as you did in your original post that a
price target is derived from it, for a moment caught my eye.
Must be a language thing, whatever. Let's just let this thread die
the death it deserves.
Scheier
"A.J. Maas" wrote:
>
> - Where Relative Strength(RS) compares 2 objects' strengths to each other
> - The Relative Strength Index(RSI) measures a single object's internal strength.
>
> This latter one RSI is written by Welles Wilder.
>
> Read on further down below for more answers.
>
> Regards,
> Ton Maas
> ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "scheier"
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: vrijdag 14 april 2000 16:19
> Subject: Re: Eat thy words : Mark Mobius & Abbey Cohen
>
> > I presume those rather cryptic remarks regarding Waxdaq were all in
> > some humor: "According to the RSI, the WAXdaq level to expect a
> > Turnaround....to take place = its former breakout 2923."
>
> 1. Nope. Plain fact on a maturing <rising to adult-hood> index.
> Back in 1990 I had asked my Data Provider here in the Netherlands to include
> this Index, since that it not only represented *the other* NY bourse, but also
> represented the High Tech Co's, which are the engine's of anyone's economy,
> and Index is therefore a (slightly) Modern version of the in the Dow Theory common
> sense down to earth approach of what makes or breaks *the Society*, eg
> our world.
>
> 2. Ofcourse. In humor, spicing the shorthand mail a little......................
> a. WAX=soft (and this too can be a crypt by itselve, since the software companies
> are a {major} part in that index).
> b. WAXcore=also opposite and < HARDcore
> c. 2923=here we come {friday the 14th, always an unlucky day !!}
>
> > What in the world does RSI have to do with predicting a future
> > target? Would like to hear you expound on this technique if there's
> > really anything to it.
>
> New to TA?
>
> RSI
> The RSI is the only single indicator that can predict price levels(+slightly lesser the moves),
> the price level where an indicator(in this the Price) should + ought to be.
>
> Plots
> In a Chart it is plotted
> 1. In its own inner window the internal strength is plotted in a 0-100 scale.
> 2. In the Base Security window it is plotted atop of the Price indicator.
>
> Reading
> On Chart this is done by comparing its internal strength to its actual external realised values.
> Like the weather forecasts, it is not always 100% fool proove, but comes closest to.
>
> Interpretation
> For interpretation and further info be refered to Manuals/Helps/Books on the RSI etc.
>
> Leader
> It is also therefore the one indicator that stands way above any of the other basic set of
> indicators that were developped over time {and that are many}, as well above the non-basic
> indicators.
>
> Results
> There are indicators nearly achieving what RSI can/does, but the results are often also
> of a lesser degree.
>
> Experience
> It is one of the first indicators that I have started out with 13 years ago, and if a package would
> only carry this indicator in its luggage, its is rich enough to succesfully readthe market(s).
>
>
> > And why is Abbey Cohen eating her words? From a street analyst, her
> > remarks of raising cash are as close to an outright sell signal as
> > you ever get from Wall St types. Is seems anybody still long
> > mutual funds are eating her words. She's basking in the light of "I
> > told you so". You can be sure their best clients already heard that
> > advice well before it hit the street.
>
> Never heard of these people. Don't care about what was written here in this section either.
>
> >
> > Scheier
> >
> > "A.J. Maas" wrote:
> > >
> > > The now being polished of NASdaq..............{falling angel}
> > > (North America Shakeout downdive and quick).
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ton Maas
> > > ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> > > Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Lionel Issen" <lissen@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: vrijdag 14 april 2000 0:01
> > > Subject: Re: Eat thy words : Mark Mobius & Abbey Cohen
> > >
> > > > I am missing something. What is WAXdaq?
> > > > Lionel Issen
> > > > lissen@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: A.J. Maas <anthmaas@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 12:19 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: Eat thy words : Mark Mobius & Abbey Cohen
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Since the WAXdaq lost its shine.......................
> > > > >
> > > > > According to the RSI, the WAXdaq level to expect a Turnaround(=major
> > > > support)
> > > > > to take place = its former breakout 2923.
> > > > >
> > > > > Your counts are always welcomed, tho.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Ton Maas
> > > > > ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> > > > > Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Rajesh" <rajesh@xxxxxxxx>
> > > > > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Sent: vrijdag 31 maart 2000 17:45
> > > > > Subject: Eat thy words : Mark Mobius & Abbey Cohen
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Re : Nasdaq
> > > > > > I'm willing to take them (Mark Mobius & Abbey Cohen) head on. I don't
> > > > > > at all think that the Nasdaq is going to crash. If you see the chart,
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > can clearly see that this is a devastating c-wave of an
> > > > > > a-b-c correction. Mark & Abbey have done the perfect tango with Elliot
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > reading the unfolding of the c-wave in advance.
> > > > > > Looking at the chart you can see
> > > > > > 1. the a-wave from the market top
> > > > > > 2. the b-wave (in clear 3-waves) going to make a possible double top
> > > > > > 3. the c-wave downwards which has unfolded
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This c-wave will be in 5-impulsive waves downward but the daily chart
> > > > > > shows no breaking-up of the c-wave, hence it is a monowave and in
> > > > > > order to see the internal structure of this c-wave you will have to look
> > > > > >
> > > > > > at
> > > > > > the hourly charts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Coming back to the Nasdaq chart
> > > > > > 1. You will notice the a-b-c formation made by the market during
> > > > > > January/February 2000 after a sustained rise from mid-October 1999. In
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > a-b-c flat formation, the b-wave crossed the market top and the c-wave
> > > > > > failed to go below the bottom of wave-a. Hence, the formation was an
> > > > > > irregular failure. This was the first sign of strength in the market.
> > > > > > The
> > > > > > subsequent rise to the market high of
> > > > > > 5000+ fell far short of the expected rise that should follow an
> > > > > > irregular
> > > > > > failure pattern. The only conclusion one can draw is that the rise was
> > > > > > corrective in nature, qualifying it as either a larger degree B-wave or
> > > > > > an
> > > > > > X-wave.
> > > > > > 2. In all probability it was an X-wave leading me to believe that the
> > > > > > a-b-c formation (we are in the c-wave of this formation) after the
> > > > > > market
> > > > > > high of 5000+ is only part of a corrective combination which
> > > > > > by itself is suggesting tremendous strength in the market.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In my opinion, the market may not even fall into the price zone of
> > > > > > the first a-b-c which is approx 4250. Even if this level is broken,
> > > > > > the market will never go below the c-wave of the first a-b-c which is
> > > > > > approx 3750.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If these readings of mine are correct, then when the fall is over, the
> > > > > > Nasdaq composite would commence it's most phenomenol bull run in
> > > > > > it's history.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ciao
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
|