|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Steve:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Thanks for mentioning Prophet Finance. They
have an interesting web site at <A
href="http://www.prophetfinance.com";>www.prophetfinance.com</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Can you send me some information, or keep me
posted, on items I thru L?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>You certainly have a lot on your
platter.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Regards</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Lionel Issen<BR><A
href="mailto:lissen@xxxxxxxxx";>lissen@xxxxxxxxx</A></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A href="mailto:kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx"; title=kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>Steve
Karnish</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, April 16, 2000 11:39
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Flip it good/flippant
better.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Ton,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I saw a version of the Wiz on Saturday and the
wizard reminded me of you. Omnipotent, passing judgement, and dispensing
snide remarks from behind the protection of a thin veil (email). I once
wrote you, in a private email, "Ton is God". An unmerciful God you
turned out to be! What "trips your trigger" most about my shameless
commercial pursuits?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Are you upset about:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>A. Equis International's 60 second
commercial, with yours truly, that's been running on CNBC for the last
month?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>B. The quarter page ads, the last couple of
months, that have been running in Investors Business Daily talking about my
brokerage experience and how MetaStock has benefited me?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>C. The partnership and licensing agreement
I signed with Prophet Finance.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>D. The fact that I'm one of the featured
technicians at ProFarmer's new website (a 137 year old organization).
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>E. My new partnership with the Spokane
folks that manage two billion dollars (I'm sure that's now a bit less after
last week).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>F. Becoming only one of 30 Registered
Investment Advisors in the state of Idaho.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>G. The fact that I sell MetaStock Pro for
two hundred bucks cheaper than Equis.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>H. My bookstore.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I. My negotiations with national
"business accelerator" firms.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>J. The book I'm currently writing
with my partner.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>K. The MetaStock add-on program that is
almost developed.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>L. The Visual Basic program that will
eliminate the need for EOD.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>M. The fifty folks who I trade
for.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>In the late '70's I recall the phone calls I used
to have with Perry Kaufman when I was working for Paine Webber and then
Thomson McKinnon. He was writing his first two books and was thirsty for
any approaches he could find. I was tinkering with moving average
oscillators, and the subject fascinated him. I think he stole some ideas
from me, but since that time, I've STOLEN his PJ5 moving average.
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>In the winter of 1981, I had an opportunity to
spend a week with Welles Wilder in Houston. He was taping an
instructional technical video, and I watched with interest for a week.
When the cameras were off, I fired all the questions I could conjure about the
RSI. I read his book soon after it came out and loved the way the RSI
worked. Of course, the 14 period RSI was not my cup of tea. To
anyone who would listen, I suggested a 9 period RSI with 20 and 80 as
trigger levels. Did I STEAL the RSI from Welles...you bet your European
ass I did. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Over the years I've STOLEN from anyone who will
let me. I've always liked to give credit to whoever I PICKPOCKET.
That's why I call it the CCT Bollinger Band Histogram. The Histogram is
a private joke, and I have the feeling that you probably lack a sense of
humor, so I'll keep it private. The FibCMO is not masking
anything. I SWIPED Tuschar's formula, improved on it, implemented it
into a system, back-tested it, and now trade it profitably. <FONT
face=Arial size=2>Since I am confessing all my sins, I have also STOLEN from
Krausze, Blau, Nisson, and many others. Mothers hide your children, the
indicator stealer is coming to town. </FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I don't recall begging (and certainly not
"bagging"). I have politely asked for formula help. Thanks to
Adam, Philip, Don, Matthew, Walter, and many others that have helped me
string together the logic that I weave into my mechanical approaches.
Without your help, I couldn't be blatantly screwing the public. I've
always tried to give more than I take. Obviously, you don't
agree.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I think maybe the "Fibonacci thing" sent you into
an irreversible disliking for my plagiaristic ways. By the way Mr.
Decimal Point, just for the record, here's a plagiarized passage about how
Fibonacci (don't you think he was cute?) introduced the Hindu-Arabic
place-valued decimal system to Europe:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>
<P><I>"Liber abbaci</I>, published in 1202 after Fibonacci's return to Italy,
was dedicated to Scotus. The book was based on the arithmetic and algebra that
Fibonacci had accumulated during his travels. The book, which went on to be
widely copied and imitated, introduced the Hindu-Arabic place-valued decimal
system and the use of Arabic numerals into Europe. Indeed, although mainly a
book about the use of Arab numerals, which became known as algorism,
simultaneous linear equations are also studied in this work".
</P></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>By the way Ton, the spring rains have come
to Cedar Creek and I suggest you move accusatory butt to higher ground.
If you continue to swill in the muck, near the river bottom, you're going to
be "up the creek without a paddle". I once said that "Ton was
God". Today, I can still say it, but I must add: "Ton is God,
Godzilla".</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Take care,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Steve Karnish<BR>Cedar Creek Trading<BR><A
href="http://www.cedarcreektrading.com";>http://www.cedarcreektrading.com</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
A.J. Maas
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Metastock-List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, April 15, 2000 5:20
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Flip it good.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Must be Flipped!! Coco Loco!!.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I'm disapointed in you.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Whereas over the past 2 years you have been bagging the
List on your knees </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>to provide you with all sorts of formulas and also begged
and pleaed to the List</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>down on </FONT><FONT size=2>your knees to help you
with the reading of and interpreting of and</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>providing of all sorts of </FONT><FONT
size=2>information for developping of your own version
variants,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>you are now </FONT><FONT size=2>turning your shrude
commercial back.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>All that is also made available in the "Everything you've
always wanted to know</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>about Bollinger Bands"-mail of which an update was send
lately (see below for</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>a short mail-discussion on the %B oscillator at that time
in 1998).</DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>To what I have seen so far from mails that
you've send can only tell that you</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>are the List's greatest Plagiarism-ist.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>If it was not for raping (in Name) the CMO, an indicator
+ spinoff varaints that are</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>widely described </FONT><FONT size=2>in his Chande's
book, than it was for the custom Linnear</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Regression(Formula) </FONT><FONT size=2>and </FONT><FONT
size=2>DMI(Formula) </FONT><FONT size=2>and </FONT><FONT size=2>their
variants that I've send, and thus now</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>lately </FONT><FONT size=2>for the raping </FONT><FONT
size=2>in Name (apart from bending the original </FONT><FONT size=2>name, a
histogram to</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>represent an </FONT><FONT size=2>indicator that is
</FONT><FONT size=2>expressed in bars within a border limited price
</FONT><FONT size=2>scale) </FONT><FONT size=2>and</DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Formula (also apart from the typo's in that formula)
for </FONT><FONT size=2>the 20+ years</DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2>ago by John </FONT><FONT size=2>Bollinger's described
<based on the bands> </FONT><FONT size=2>%B oscillator.</DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Over the past years all of the set of original formulas
for the above have all been posted</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>to the List, and </FONT><FONT size=2>all you have
</FONT><FONT size=2>had to do at that time was (and what you've done
is)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Copy + Paste.</DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>
<DIV><FONT size=2><FONT size=2>In my next mail have again included
the original standard %B. </FONT></FONT><FONT size=2>All that too is
also been</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>made available </FONT><FONT size=2>in the</DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2>"Everything you've always wanted to know </FONT><FONT
size=2>about Bollinger Bands"-mail</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>of which </FONT><FONT size=2>a revised </FONT><FONT
size=2>update was send lately. It will also show your
pleas.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Cheap, cheap, cheap PLAGIARISM (Formulas) + RAPE (Formula
Names).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Sure the CMT-course has thaught and learned you to parrot, but
plagiarism + rape, I cannot</DIV>
<DIV>remember to having seen that in this very low leveled
course.</DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I appriciate seeing any one's viewpoint or possitve
developments or positive discussions, but</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>cannot </FONT><FONT size=2>stand seeing crap {also the
reason why I quit that mediocre course}.</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV></DIV></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>The cedar creek must be a long time ago dried up
creek, not for trading practises,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>but for originality, spirit and
inspiration.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Either that, or (expression wise) "This List's success,
and your succes well derived from </FONT><FONT size=2>it,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>must have gone straight to your head".</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>You've blundered in under-estimating the fact that one
pins right through hoaxing facades</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>(on the List + commercialy) one tries </FONT><FONT
size=2>to build.</DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>You must think of the List, other people or other List
members that they are "stupid" or something.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT><FONT size=2></FONT><FONT size=2></FONT><FONT
size=2></FONT><FONT size=2></FONT><FONT size=2></FONT><FONT
size=2></FONT><FONT size=2></FONT><FONT size=2></FONT><FONT size=2>Not only
is that denigrading to the level of the List, but also to its
members. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT><BR><FONT size=2>Regards,<BR>Ton Maas</DIV></FONT>
<DIV><A href="mailto:ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";><FONT
size=2>ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</FONT></A><BR><FONT size=2>Dismiss the
".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.<BR>Homepage </FONT><A
href="http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas";><FONT
size=2>http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas</FONT></A></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>=======================================</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">----- Original Message ----- </FONT>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">From: "A.J. Maas" <</FONT><A
href="mailto:anthmaas@xxxxxx";><FONT
face="Times New Roman">anthmaas@xxxxxx</FONT></A><FONT
face="Times New Roman">></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">To: <</FONT><A
href="mailto:kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>"><FONT
face="Times New Roman">kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx></FONT></A><FONT
face="Times New Roman">; "Lionel Issen" <</FONT><A
href="mailto:lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";><FONT
face="Times New Roman">lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</FONT></A><FONT
face="Times New Roman">></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">Cc: "MetaStock-List" <</FONT><A
href="mailto:metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";><FONT
face="Times New Roman">metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</FONT></A><FONT
face="Times New Roman">></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">Sent: vrijdag 3 april 1998
13:21</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">Subject: Re: BB
histogram</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman"><BR></FONT></DIV><FONT
face="Times New Roman">> "Bollinger %B" - formula:<BR>> <BR>> -This
indicator can be obtained from </FONT><A
href="http://www.equis.com";><FONT
face="Times New Roman">www.equis.com</FONT></A><BR><FONT
face="Times New Roman">> (TechSupport/Formula's extensive
"shop").<BR>> -This indicator displayes(=indicates) where the price
resides "within"<BR>> the bands' range-width (expressed in a 0 -
100 scale-range) and<BR>> on occasion also when it is "outside"
the scale-range(<0 or >100)<BR>> -This indicator can also be used
as a:<BR>> 1. ob/os-indicator(horizontal lines at 100 and 0 ,
>100=ob , <0=os)<BR>> 2. pos/neg-oscilator* (horizontal line
at 50, pos=>50, neg=<50) <BR>> 2. divergence-indicator(f.i.
as oppose to the sec.'s price-indicator)<BR>> 3. (early
pre-)signaling trends' peaks/low-indicator(in general:<BR>>
peak=sell + low=buy)<BR>> 4.
ST-buy/sell-indicator(with up- and down crossings of<BR>>
f.i. its 20 SMA as the tricker-line)
<BR>> -This indicator can also be used with:<BR>> A. the
"floating" ob/os-zone's-indcators<BR>> B. the
bands-width(measuring)-indicators(ratio's,points,percentages) <BR>>
<BR>> *To create its oscilator-histogram right-click the indicator's
properties<BR>> and change Metastocks' (standard-configured)
straight-line(line-pattern)<BR>> to (optionaly-configurable)
horizontal-strokes(histogram-pattern).<BR>> <BR>> Regards,<BR>> Ton
Maas.<BR>> </FONT><A href="mailto:Ms-IRB@xxxxxxxxx";><FONT
face="Times New Roman">Ms-IRB@xxxxxxxxx</FONT></A><BR><FONT
face="Times New Roman">> (Ps. Wolters Kluwer(WKL-BBNasd) is about(this
Apr98 DGR 280) to<BR>> give its next uptrends' BUY-signal with the target
set at DGR 360<BR>> (ExRa US$/DGR 2.10-2.20 is then equiv. to US$
165-170) <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> -----Oorspronkelijk
bericht-----<BR>> Van: Lionel Issen <</FONT><A
href="mailto:lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";><FONT
face="Times New Roman">lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</FONT></A><FONT
face="Times New Roman">><BR>> Aan: </FONT><A
href="mailto:kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx";><FONT
face="Times New Roman">kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx</FONT></A><FONT
face="Times New Roman"> <</FONT><A
href="mailto:kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx";><FONT
face="Times New Roman">kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx</FONT></A><FONT
face="Times New Roman">><BR>> CC: MetaStock-List <</FONT><A
href="mailto:metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";><FONT
face="Times New Roman">metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</FONT></A><FONT
face="Times New Roman">><BR>> Datum: donderdag 2 april 1998
21:03<BR>> Onderwerp: Re: BB histogram<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> >Try
this:<BR>> >Plot as an indicator in its own window<BR>>
><BR>> >(the upper band - the lower band)/2<BR>> ><BR>>
>This will give you the distance from the mean.<BR>> ><BR>>
>There is probably a canned indicator that will give you the
equivalent<BR>> >information, try the standard deviation with the same
look back period as<BR>> >Bollinger.<BR>> ><BR>> >Lionel
Issen<BR>> ><BR>> >At 08:01 AM 4/2/98 -0800, Steve Karnish
wrote:<BR>> >>Can anyone help me convert Bollinger Bands into a
histogram. I can right<BR>> >>click on the indicator and get
to "properties" for the indicator...but, I'm<BR>> >>lost after
that. In this scenario: the mean becomes the zero basis
and<BR>> >>the standard deviations are parallel (two standard
deviations away). Any<BR>> >>input would be
appreciated.<BR>> >>Thanks,<BR>> >>Steve Karnish<BR>>
>> <BR>> >Lionel Issen<BR>>
>lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>=======================================</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>----- Original Message -----
<DIV>From: "Lionel Issen"</DIV>
<DIV>To: <<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>></DIV>
<DIV>Sent: zaterdag 15 april 2000 0:07</DIV>
<DIV>Subject: Re: Flip it good.</DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>> Steve:<BR>> I just didn't want to reinvent the wheel.<BR>>
Lionel Issen<BR>> <A
href="mailto:lissen@xxxxxxxxx";>lissen@xxxxxxxxx</A></DIV>
<DIV>><BR>> ----- Original Message -----<BR>> From: Jim Simko
<<A
href="mailto:jssrvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>jssrvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>>
To: <<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>>
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2000 4:19 PM<BR>> Subject: Re: Flip it
good.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> > Steve: You must have learned how to
make butter in 3rd grade also! Ha!<BR>> > Keep smoke em, Jim<BR>>
><BR>> > Steve Karnish wrote:<BR>> > ><BR>> > >
Lionel,<BR>> > ><BR>> > > I believe you (or anyone
interested) should try to discover whether the<BR>> > > simple or
"others" are best. I try to provide the list with simple<BR>> >
> frameworks for trading, yet it always seems that people want
more. I will<BR>> > > not give out "all the secrets"
that 25 years of daily research have<BR>> > > unveiled.
Besides, what do I know anyway? I went long the S&P this<BR>>
> > morning, I was educated in the Detroit Public Schools, and my
brain tissues<BR>> > > are deteriorating, as we speak, due to
my advancing years. This combination<BR>> > > of factors
should slow down your enthusiasm for my approach. I
publish my<BR>> > > trades the day before I initiate
them. I believe I owe my friends,<BR>> > > relatives,
and clients the courtesy of withholding the specific formulae<BR>> >
> that is responsible for showering their accounts with equity
infusions.<BR>> > > Besides, I've signed "intergalactic" contracts
with the "big Boyz" that<BR>> > > prohibit me from dissemenating
the specific information that you are<BR>> > > requesting. I
hope my contributions are enough. As many forum members<BR>> >
> know: clients get invited into the "secret cave" and allowed to
look at the<BR>> > > "writing on the wall".<BR>> >
><BR>> > > Take care,<BR>> > ><BR>> > > Steve
Karnish<BR>> > > Cedar Creek Trading<BR>> > > <A
href="http://www.cedarcreektrading.com";>http://www.cedarcreektrading.com</A><BR>>
> > ----- Original Message -----<BR>> > > From: Lionel Issen
<lissen@xxxxxxxxx><BR>> >
> To: <<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>>
> > Sent: Friday, April 14, 2000 10:12 AM<BR>> > > Subject:
Re: Flip it good.<BR>> > ><BR>> > > > Steve:<BR>>
> > ><BR>> > > > This is an interesting indicator. Is
the simple mov better than the other<BR>> > > > available
(in metastock) mov's.<BR>> > > > Lionel Issen<BR>> > >
> lissen@xxxxxxxxx<BR>> >
> > ----- Original Message -----<BR>> > > > From: Steve
Karnish <<A
href="mailto:kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx";>kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>> >
> > To: <<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>>
> > > Sent: Friday, April 14, 2000 9:48 AM<BR>> > > >
Subject: Re: Flip it good.<BR>> > > ><BR>> > >
><BR>> > > > > This is not the super-secret, one of a
kind, better than all the rest,<BR>> > > <FONT
face="Times New Roman">> > </FONT>CCT Bollinger Band Histogram,
but basically there is not much<BR>> <FONT face="Times New Roman">>
> > > </FONT>difference.<BR>> > > > ><BR>> >
> > > ((C+2*Std(C,20)-Mov(C,20,S))/(4*(Std(C,20)))*100)<BR>>
> > > ><BR>> > > > > If you want the modified
version, email me privately and I'll tell you<BR>> > > >
> where to send the unmarked bills.<BR>> > > >
><BR>> > > > > Steve Karnish<BR>> > > > >
Cedar Creek Trading<BR>> > > > > <A
href="http://www.cedarcreektrading.com";>http://www.cedarcreektrading.com</A><BR>>
> > > > ----- Original Message -----<BR>> > > > >
From: rbox <jrbox@xxxxxxx><BR>>
> > > > To: <<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>>
> > > > Sent: Friday, April 14, 2000 6:17 AM<BR>> > >
> > Subject: Re: Flip it good.<BR>> > > > ><BR>>
> > > ><BR>> > > > > > Steve, could you please
post the formula<BR>> > > > > > for the CCT Bollinger Band
Histogram?<BR>> > > > > > Thanks a
lot!</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon Apr 17 08:10:56 2000
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA31074
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 07:58:13 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA29633
for metastock-outgoing; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 08:24:45 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA29629
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 08:24:42 -0600
Received: from mercury.shreve.net (root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [208.206.76.23])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA08038
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 08:36:57 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from al-tag (shv2-157.shreve.net [208.214.44.157])
by mercury.shreve.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA21231
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 09:19:43 -0500
Message-Id: <200004171419.JAA21231@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Al Taglavore" <altag@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Money Management Stops
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 09:19:43 -0500
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
Don't think so. What is to say that of the 30% that is wrong, those trades
could not be consecutive (700 winners, 300 losers)? For my trading, I
always recognize that I have a 50/50 chance of sucess/failure on any trade.
There is a probability that, based on past results, a methodology will
produce a win factor of 70%, but each trade is an independent transaction.
Al Taglavore
----------
> From: Michel Amelinckx <Michel.Amelinckx@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Money Management Stops
> Date: Monday, April 17, 2000 7:34 AM
>
> Thanks for helping me out here. I guess my explanation was not very
> understandable. And the example of the roulette table was even worse
> actually it was WRONG because of course you still have the 0, so this was
> WRONG.
> What I just tried to say, like described here below is if you have a
system
> with 70% prob. (of course these statistics are as good as you test them)
and
> your system shows 4 or more LOSES IN A ROW. And because of this it is
> deviating from your mean and thus the prob. of the next trade being
correct
> is higher. (There is of course a change that your system stops working at
> that point)
> Is this incorrect ?
>
> Greetings
>
> Mickey
> B
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Lionel Issen
> > Sent: vrijdag 14 april 2000 5:05
> > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: Money Management Stops
> >
> >
> > Ug:
> >
> > You are correct. Feller showed in his statistics books that,
> > while it is
> > rare, you can have a long string of heads (or tails). Each toss is
> > independent of the other. Even if a system is 75% correct,
> > you can have a
> > long string of losing trades. There are times when nothing
> > seems to work and
> > other times when anything seems to work.
> > Lionel Issen
> > lissen@xxxxxxxxx
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <ug@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 4:21 PM
> > Subject: RE: Money Management Stops
> >
> >
> > > Michel Amelinckx writes:
> > >
> > > > Same thing with roulette, they hate me in the casinos because if I
> > > > play roulette I play on red and black. I wait till red
> > (black)past 3
> > > > or 4 times in a row and then play on the other colour. And the
> > > > longer you wait, like 5 or 6 times on red (black) the higher the
> > > > probability the next will be the other colour. Although 6
> > times the
> > > > same colour is very rare. And this they don't like in casinos.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > If a coin tossed comes up heads 4 times in a row, what's
> > the chance it
> > > will be tails next time?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > If a system is 50% wins, and you lose 4 in a row, what't
> > the chance of
> > > a winning trade next time?
> > >
> > >
> > > Given that each trade is independent of the others, which I
> > THINK you
> > > are in agreement with, the above 2 are the same situation, so why
> > > would you say one is 50% and one is 99?
> >
> >
|