|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
On Mon, 17 Apr 2000 15:41:06 -0700, you wrote:
>I hope you don't mind, but I've added a few comments to your post. Again,
>these are just my opinions.
Guy,
thank you for your comments. It is very helpfully for me, if I find my
ideas about trading confirmed by a practical expert, because I'm
coming more from the "theoretical" side, i.e. systems engineering.
>forever. Unfortunately, the market is dynamic, not static. Emotion,
>weather, famine, war, euphoria and the gamut of human psychology all impact
>the markets at any given time. I'll save more on this for your last
>remarks.
I like things to be dynamic. Dynamic systems often are not fully
understood by 100% of the system actors. So there hopefully is room to
identify "imperfections" (e.g. with the aid of a trading system) to
make some money ...B-)...
> This is exactly what we have done, and why it has been
>so hard for me to put it into words. We have a bunch of unique systems that
>we have developed, that all work fairly well by themselves. By combining
>these various systems (I call them indicators, but reflecting on your words,
>systems would be a better choice) with weighting factors, we are able to
>'statistically' recognize different markets.
Do you execute the IN/OUT signals from every single trading system in
parallel or do you add up the different signal to one (weighted)
signal which you use for trading?
Imo, it should be most effective to do the first, if any single system
is specialized to identify a particular profitable pattern.
mfg rudolf stricker
| Disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own.
|