|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.3013.2600" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=718500302-27042000>Outlook'97, Ton?</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=718500302-27042000> That was the beta that everyone abandoned
when '98 showed :o)</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]<B>On
Behalf Of</B> A.J. Maas<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, April 26, 2000 4:50
PM<BR><B>To:</B> Metastock-List<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: Metastock pro
7.0<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2><FONT size=2>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Better: Why use heavy sturdy complex Outlook(former more
sturdy+more complex Exchange)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>
when you can have Outlook Express, </FONT>a fluent direct no-nonsense,
no-error-ed, FREE mailer and HTML Editor?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Outlook will only be used in Offices. For home use it is too large, too
cumbersome and far too sturdy.</DIV>
<DIV>But even at an Office I will refrain from using Outlook. Simply,
because it cannot handle messages, let alone emails and</DIV>
<DIV>their layouts properly, eg email's layouts will be shown mutulated and
cripled (even the old and boring plain Text messages).</DIV>
<DIV>Exchange was the first program I had DELETED from my machine. And at work
it only works as a simple PopUp progarm.</DIV>
<DIV>Even its Address book is a drag to work with,and all that accounts for
the Outlook97 program too.(Don't know 'bout the 2K,
tho), </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><STRONG><U>MetaStock FAQ's - series of
Tips</U></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><STRONG></STRONG></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><FONT color=#0000ff><STRONG>Tip-3</STRONG></FONT>. How to
activate / deactivate a user-definable-feature's option box / button (the
control) ? </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT></FONT></FONT><FONT size=2> </DIV></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I only 'throw this in' as an example, eg as to how to get a
control that's inactive(greyed out), active again.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>(this is common procedure throughout pc
programs):</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT
size=2>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Basicaly, when Running MSK with an EMPTY Startup
window and clicking the on WorkMenu available</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Tools|Options... Function, </FONT><FONT size=2>than on the
Option window's Chart Options TAB both the Show ALL Chart Title
Bars</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>and Show ALL Chart Toolbars </FONT><FONT size=2>controls
are</FONT> <FONT size=2>inactive(greyed), this since
an underlaying object(eg a chart)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>is not active(Open).</DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Now Open a Chart/Layout and than go back to Tools|Options
and the Chart Options TAB, and</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>notice that now </FONT><FONT size=2>the SACTB and SALCB
controls are activated, and you are now also able
to check</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>or uncheck these controls.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Now relating the above working theory to the below
mentioned (in MSK v70-Pro newly present)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><FONT color=#0000ff>Allow e-mail alerts box
</FONT></FONT><FONT size=2>(=control) than at least an underlaying
object(Chart/Layout) </FONT><FONT size=2>too will have</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>to be active(Open). And then when Chart/Layout is
active(Open), the control to be activated as well,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>giving you the option to uncheck control (Turn it
OFF).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Cumbersome? Yep! Programmers could have tested this upfront.
However, it is again one other</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>addition to the many FAQ's </FONT><FONT size=2>set of
questions on MetaStock issue's that aren't explained
anywhere,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>and computerwise are logic, but when you think of
it is unlogic </FONT><FONT size=2>in daily program usage.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Therefore, Equis Programmers, for the program's standard
factory settings (on installation of program)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>have </FONT><FONT size=2>this Allow Email
Alerts control STANDARD turned OFF.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2> </DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2>If somebody then wants to use this functionality, let
him/her search for the Alerts section, eg a feature</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>that o</FONT><FONT size=2>ught </FONT><FONT size=2>to
be added to the MetaStock manual's The Workplace section, a
section that ought to be</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>devoted to the thousand's of Option TABs that are scattered
around the program. And while at it, why</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>not bring these thousands of TABs back to
normal, for example to the in Windows & Office
programs</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>commonly available </FONT><FONT size=2>"one
single windowed" (multiple TABed) Options Function and thus to
the extend</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>that the user's Standard Program Options only needed to be
set in a ONE SINGLE WINDOWED Option</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>window, which is quite common in Windows 9x
compatible programs.</DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2>The inefficient multi windowed Option windows, stemming
from the old Windows 3.11-days, are way over</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>by
now. </DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT><BR>Regards,<BR>Ton Maas<BR><A
href="mailto:ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A><BR>Dismiss
the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.<BR>Homepage <A
href="http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas";>http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas</A></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
Jean-Paul Duchesne </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> woensdag 26 april 2000
15:24</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Fw: Metastock pro 7.0</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Forward response to Equis support email.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>For me, Outlook Express is far more used than Outlook and
I don't understand why Outlook Express is not compliant with Metastock. Why
ignore a de facto industry standard?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Thanks a lot to all.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Jean-Paul Duchesne</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> Jean-Paul
Duchesne </DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A href="mailto:support@xxxxxxxxx";
title=support@xxxxxxxxx>Equis Support</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, April 25, 2000 11:42 PM</DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: Metastock pro 7.0</DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Lynn,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Thank you for your email.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Unfortunatly, I cannot check or uncheck the Allow emails
alert since it is greyed. It seems I am not the only one to have this
problem.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I tried to delete and re-install my program: nothing
better. I installed my program in three other computers with the same basic
configuration and with Outlook express, two worked perfectly, one other and
mine have this annoying problem and the grayed Allow email
alert!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>It is difficult to see something logical.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>If you can give me a solution,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Thank you.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Jean-Paul Duchesne</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A href="mailto:support@xxxxxxxxx"; title=support@xxxxxxxxx>Equis
Support</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> maxpaul21</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, April 25, 2000 5:46
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: Metastock pro 7.0</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=558272621-25042000>Jean-Paul,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=558272621-25042000>
<P><FONT size=2><FONT color=#0000ff>Outlook Express is incompatible with
the e-mail alerts sent by the Expert Advisor<SPAN
class=558272621-25042000> in MetaStock Professional</SPAN>. <SPAN
class=558272621-25042000>To receive e-mail alerts, you must have a full
MAPI compliant e-mail program installed as the default e-mail client in
Windows.</SPAN><B></P></B></FONT></FONT>
<P><FONT color=#0000ff size=2><FONT size=2><FONT color=#0000ff>Outlook
Express</FONT></FONT> is MAPI-compliant, but unfortunately it only
supports a limited subset of MAPI, called Simple MAPI. Unfortunately,
our e-mail alerts currently require full MAPI, which <FONT size=2><FONT
color=#0000ff>Outlook Express</FONT></FONT> does not support.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2><FONT color=#0000ff>The reason we need full MAPI is that
users can create multiple Profiles in Outlook and Exchange. If you try to
send an e-mail using Simple MAPI to a program with multiple Profiles, a
dialog will come up asking which Profile to use. This would obviously
render e-mail alerts useless to users, since no alerts would be sent until
they came back to their machine and chose a Profile.<SPAN
class=558272621-25042000> </SPAN></FONT></FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2><FONT color=#0000ff><SPAN class=558272621-25042000>You can
deselect the option that Allows e-mail
alert.</SPAN></FONT></FONT></SPAN><FONT face=Tahoma><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=558272621-25042000><FONT color=#0000ff
face=Arial></FONT></SPAN></FONT></FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Tahoma><FONT size=2><SPAN class=558272621-25042000><FONT
color=#0000ff face=Arial>Open Tools menu</FONT></SPAN></FONT></FONT></P>
<P><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=558272621-25042000>Select Options</SPAN></FONT></P>
<P><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=558272621-25042000>Click Alerts tab</SPAN></FONT></P>
<P><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=558272621-25042000>Uncheck the "Allow e-mail alerts"
box</SPAN></FONT></P>
<P><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=558272621-25042000>Click OK</SPAN></FONT></P>
<P><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=558272621-25042000>Thank you,<FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN></FONT></P>
<P><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=558272621-25042000><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2>Lynn<BR>Equis Support<BR><U></U></FONT><U><FONT color=#0000ff
face="Times New Roman" size=2><<A href="http://www.equis.com/";
target=_blank>http://www.equis.com/</A>></FONT></U><BR><U><FONT
color=#0000ff face="Times New Roman" size=2><<A
href="http://www.equis.com/customer/support/";
target=_blank>http://www.equis.com/customer/support/</A>></FONT></U><BR><BR><FONT
color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2>Please include previous email answers and
questions in your response.<BR><BR>Equis and MetaStock and MetaStock
Professional are registered trademarks<BR>of Equis International. Achelis
Binary Wave, The DownLoader, Expert<BR>Advisor, OptionScope, Quotecenter,
and Smart Charts are trademarks of<BR>Equis International.</FONT>
</P></SPAN></FONT>
<P> </P></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV align=left class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr><FONT
face=Tahoma><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=558272621-25042000> </SPAN>-----Original
Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Jean-Paul Duchesne
[mailto:maxpaul21@xxxxxxxxxxx]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, April 25, 2000
9:30 AM<BR><B>To:</B> metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR><B>Subject:</B>
Metastock pro 7.0<BR><BR></DIV></FONT></FONT>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Nobody had this problem?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Nobody at Equis can give me a
solution?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Help!!!!!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">
<DIV> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Every time I open MSK pro 7.0, I have an
error message saying with a title "Microsoft Outlook": "Either there is
no default mail client or the current mail client cannot fulfill the
messaging request. Please run Microsoft Outlook and set it as the
default mail client". </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I have Microsoft Office 2000 in my
computer(Windows 98 SE) but I don't use Outlook. I use Outlook Express
and it is set as my default email program. If Outlook Express is not my
default email program, I cannot have my emails from
Hotmail.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Please, if somebody has solved this small
problem, I should be happy to know how I can open MSK without this error
message.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Thank you very much.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Jean-Paul
Duchesne</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Wed Apr 26 20:24:42 2000
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA20163
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 20:14:04 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id UAA12629
for metastock-outgoing; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 20:13:52 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA12625
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 20:13:49 -0600
Received: from sm0101.promedia.net (root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [208.131.40.4])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA16049
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 20:26:59 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from TOMCAT (ppp-208-171-197-188.01.promedia.net [208.171.197.188])
by sm0101.promedia.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e3R2Aa008761
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 19:10:37 -0700
From: "Bob Jagow" <bjagow@xxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Three Line Break
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 19:10:38 -0700
Message-ID: <00c401bfafed$c80453e0$1bc5abd0@xxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
In-Reply-To: <20000427005012.21428.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
The problem with 3-line break is that you can't code it in Metastock.
I can, however, code its kissin' cousin, PnF.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of José Carlos Duarte
Areia
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 7:50 PM
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Three Line Break
I don't use Renko and Point and Fig, and start to look charts of TLBreak
today, so... I can't compare each type.
I'm sending a Dow chart with the rules I read at Nison's book, take a look
and let me know what you think.
I'going to read the W Arnold article tomorrow and learn a bit more.
[],s JC
>From: "Lionel Issen" <lissen@xxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: Three Line Break
>Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 17:08:57 -0500
>
>hat is the advantage, if any, of Renko over point and figure?
>Lionel Issen
>lissen@xxxxxxxxx
>----- Original Message -----
>From: José Carlos Duarte Areia <jcdareia@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 4:56 PM
>Subject: Re: Three Line Break
>
>
> > That's what I want to know, if someone know what issue of TASC the
>article
> > was edited.
> > No I do not used Renko yet, but Three Line Break looks to me easy and
> > effective.
> >
> > Ata Vista show me a few sites with the subject.
> >
> > http://www.paritech.com.au/Trading/technical/PriceCharts/threeline.htm
> >
> > http://www.linnsoft.com/welcome/charts.htm
> >
> > [],s JC
> >
> > >From: Wesley E Norman <wenorman@xxxxxxxx>
> > >Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >Subject: Re: Three Line Break
> > >Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 14:34:16 -0400
> > >
> > >What issue of TASC, please.
> > >Thank you
> > >Wes Norman
> > >Have you been successful with RENKO?
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
> >
>
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
|