|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>John ... What you say below makes sense.
However ..... Metastock support does indeed participate on this list.
Emails directly to support have produced no response in the past. And.....
appeals to support through this list have produced results in the past, and
apparently got the problem resolved again today. Doesn't make a lot of
sense to me either. MS support, if you're listening, how do we solve these
problems in the future without causing John undue hardship?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Best regards,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Michael Spencer</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>John Manasco <<A
href="mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxx";>john@xxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To: </B><A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> <<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Wednesday, May 03, 2000 2:34 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Re: Date/time
problem<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Michael</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>You're sending this to the Metastock list not
Metastock support. We can't help you with your problem. All you're doing is
cluttering up my inbox with items I can't help you with.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>John Manasco</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A href="mailto:mpspencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=mpspencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Michael Spencer</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, May 03, 2000 3:00
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Fw: Date/time
problem</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Second
Request:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><BR> </DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Metastock Support,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>I am yet again receiving mail that is
dated approximately 14 hours into the future. Again, it is making
a mess of my inbox. Would you kindly correct this problem, as you
have in the past. Thank you. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Michael
Spencer</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Wed May 03 20:11:00 2000
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA09259
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 4 May 2000 07:32:46 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA16150
for metastock-outgoing; Wed, 3 May 2000 17:38:29 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA16147
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 3 May 2000 17:38:26 -0600
Received: from smtp02.wxs.nl (smtp02.wxs.nl [195.121.6.60])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA01313
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 3 May 2000 17:54:06 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from escom ([195.121.219.58]) by smtp02.wxs.nl
(Netscape Messaging Server 3.61) with SMTP id AAA6ED4
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 4 May 2000 01:37:05 +0200
Message-ID: <01e501bfb558$f0b05260$d0dc79c3@xxxxx>
From: "A.J. Maas" <anthmaas@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Metastock-List" <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20000503135955.21518.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: (Market) S&P analysis critique
Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 01:35:23 +0200
Organization: Ms-IRB
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.3825.400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.3825.400
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
To give you a hard landing "back to earth" with the so called "expert",
compare the Periodic results of the so called "expert"
Basic Momentum Coppock RSIderivative "Mr.expert"
------------------------ ------------- ------------------- ----------------
Date: Signal Date: Signal Date: Signal Date: Signal
0126 - Negative 1229 - Sell 0204 - Buy 0200 - Bullish
0215 - Positive cont. 0214 - Sell cont.
0217 - Negative cont. cont. cont.
0309 - Positive 0320 - Buy 0301 - Buy cont.
cont. cont. 0330 - Sell 0329 - Bearish
0413 - Negative 0412 - Sell cont. 0419 - Bullish
cont. cont. 0425 - Buy 0502 - Bearish
If the S&P keeps up its very recent developped Up momentum, than within a few
days from now a Postive/Buy will be signaled by both the BM and the Coppock, where
the BM signal can be expected within the coming 2-3 days and the Coppock
within 5-10 days from now.
1408 should now hold, which is then a 2nd higher Low in both the Price and
in the confirming RSI, eg an UpTrend.
Else, a descending Triangle(1552-1339) will be formed and should (Trendwise)
not be traded for the moment, until a clear break (either way) is made.
Regards,
Ton Maas
ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
----- Original Message -----
From: "j seed" <jseed_10@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: woensdag 3 mei 2000 15:59
Subject: Re: (Market) S&P analysis critique
> Adam,
> In theory I agree with your accessment of the market. In principle I'd have
> to wave a big flag. Here's why; I took a look at the monthly, weekly, and
> daily bars of the S&P. When I looked at the monthly and zoomed out to
> capture all the way back to 1996, I saw a bullish trend. This is also
> confirmed by applying the trend expert you sent. This then is where I would
> disagree. Aug., Sep., and Oct. of '98 were bearish with a drop below the
> Gann HiLo. Now if my memory serves me correctly I can remember a whole lot
> of people crying about that time. Came close again in Jul., Aug., and Sep.
> of '99 but never went below the Gann HiLo...just some congestion. As for May
> of this year, I'm getting one of those bright green bars that denotes a bull
> trend.
>
> Now when I switch to weekly bars and zoom in to capture all the way back to
> Jul. of '98, the picture changes dramatically. Jul.'98 ushered in a bearish
> trend which consolidated and corrected to bullish in Sep. and Oct. of '98.
> Moving forward to '00, I see another bear trend that began in the last week
> of Jan. and ended in the last week of Feb. We then had some consolidation
> and finally broke out in the second week of March. Next, we had 4 nice
> bullish weeks and have finally entered into another period of bearish
> consolidation. Okay, I'm just about ready for CNBC!
>
> Finally, lets switch to the daily chart still using your expert. I'm
> displaying all the way back to Feb.,'00 and see that on Mar. 29th we entered
> into a bearish trend with some consolidation until April 19th when the
> market broke above the Gann HiLo and went bullish until yesterday, 5-29. We
> have now dropped below our Gann HiLo and are again in bearish territory.
> This is a consolidation bar and not a trend which could mean that we may
> again turn bullish (sounds like Bill Williams huh). If I were going to play
> this market bearish I'd probably wait for a confirming bear trend bar which
> should occur at the 1415 mark.
>
> One final point that I would make and that is that none of this would have
> been possible without the expert or the Gann HiLo that you so graciously
> offered. I can only say, THANKS. It's one helluva system for analysis!
>
> J.
>
> >From: "Adam Hefner" <vonhef@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: (Market) S&P analysis part2
> >Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 22:52:18 -0500
> >
> >Now that I have my basic direction determined from the monthly,
> >lets analyze the daily bars: I was noticing over the week-end that
> >the daily bars had retrace to the 61.8% line and entered into congestion.
> >This congestion suggest a possible reverse from the up move since mid
> >April. Monday's close below the lower confines of congestion (around 1458)
> >further strengthens my monthly analysis of downward movement.
> > Well..now that I have an analysis...how to trade? Well It looks like a
> >good
> >sell level would be at 1464. with the protection stop around 1495. The
> >calculated risk on the protection is 31 points and the calculated projected
> >low is around 1350 (100 points). Of course analysis can be wrong, in
> >several
> >ways. My entry point could be missed and I may not get into the market, or
> >the market may reverse tomorrow and blow-up my sell.
> >Regardless..this is NOT a recommendation, only an exercise for you to
> >critique.
> >
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>
|